Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Cannabis and Psychosis: Getting Harder to Argue Against Causation

I lean in the direction that the use of marijuana here is trying to self treat psychosis, even though it is not medically evident yet. But your doctor will never prescribe marijuana. 

I'm doing marijuana after my next stroke, it is only 90 miles to Canada and Michigan has legalized it. 

My 13 reasons for marijuana use post-stroke.  

Don't follow me, I'm not medically trained.

 

Cannabis and Psychosis: Getting Harder to Argue Against Causation

Case-control study adds to mounting evidence, though "bidirectional" relationship can't be ruled out

  • by Staff Writer, MedPage Today
People who used cannabis every day were at higher risk of developing a first psychotic episode versus people who never used cannabis, in a case-control study conducted in Europe and Brazil.
Compared with non-users, daily cannabis users had more than a three-fold higher odds for incident psychosis (adjusted odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI 2.2-4.1), reported Marta Di Forti, PhD, of the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience at King's College London, and colleagues.
Daily users in cities with relatively widespread availability of high-potency cannabis -- defined as a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration ≥10% -- saw an even higher chance for psychosis versus non-users (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 2.5-6.3), they stated in Lancet Psychiatry.
However, one notable study limitation was the lack of data on cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations in the cannabis used by these patients. Also, cannabis use in general was self-reported, and not validated by measures like blood or urine samples. The cutoff between high and low potency (10% THC ) was rather conservative, the authors noted.
Despite the researchers "assuming causality" many times throughout their study, "does this mean we can now be sure that (daily and high potency) cannabis use causes psychosis? Unfortunately, not all the evidence utilising different methods is consistent about causality," said Suzanne Gage, PhD, of the University of Liverpool in England, in an accompanying commentary.
"Di Forti and colleagues' study asks participants about their cannabis use prior to their first episode psychosis diagnosis, but it is possible that subclinical symptoms might have existed prior to cannabis initiation, meaning that associations in the opposite direction cannot be ruled out," she wrote. It is "perfectly possible" the relationship is bidirectional, Gage added, "as suggested by other work using genetic variables as proxies for the exposures of interest in a Mendelian randomisation design.
But Gage also conceded that the bulk of evidence to date indicates "that for some individuals there is an increased risk of psychosis resulting from daily use of high potency cannabis," which the current study supports. (Indeed, a longitudinal study reported last year found that psychotic episodes more often followed cannabis initiation than the other way around.)
The current analysis included data on 901 adults (ages 18 to 64) with first-episode psychosis diagnosed with ICD-10 criteria at a mental health service. These patients came from across 11 different sites in Brazil and Europe, including the Netherlands, the U.K., France, Spain, and Italy. They were compared with over 1,200 psychosis-free controls from the same sites.
People with first-episode psychosis tended to be younger, male, an ethnic minority, and less educated than controls. Some 65% of cases reported any lifetime use of cannabis compared with 46% of controls.
Via the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire, participants reported six measures of cannabis use, which included lifetime use, current use, age of first use, lifetime frequency, and weekly money spent on cannabis. Those who spent at least €20 per week (around $23) on cannabis also had higher odds of psychosis (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.8, P<0.0001), as well as those who first used cannabis before they were age 16 years (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, P=0.01).
Di Forti and colleagues wanted to determine whether cannabis potency had any relationship with psychosis risk, but they did not have direct data from the cannabis products that participants reported using. The city of residence was used as a proxy instead, based on published reports about the availability of high-potency cannabis by city. Those reports indicated that THC content varied widely: up to 70% in Amsterdam versus less than 10% in Italy, Spain, and France, where weaker herbal types of marijuana were typical.
On the basis of these data, the researchers estimated that if only cannabis with <10% THC was available, about 12% (95% CI 3.0-16.1%) of first-episode psychosis cases from the overall sample could have been prevented. In areas where more potent cannabis is popular, they suggested upwards of 30% (95% CI 15.2-40.0%) of first psychosis cases could have been avoided in London (where the most common product is 14% THC) and over 50% (95% CI 27.4-66.0%) of cases in Amsterdam could have been prevented if only low potency cannabis was an option.
"Given the changing legal status of cannabis across the world, and the associated potential for an increase in use," Gage concluded in her editorial, "the next priority is to identify which individuals are at risk from daily potent cannabis use, and to develop educational strategies and interventions to mitigate this."
The study was funded by the Medical Research Council, the European Community's Seventh Framework Program, the São Paulo Research Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, the NIHR BRC at University College London, and the Wellcome Trust.
Di Forti disclosed a relevant relationship with Janssen. Co-authors disclosed multiple relevant relationships with industry including Janssen, Lundbeck, Adamed, Janssen­Cilag, Otsuka, Gedeon Richter, Merck, Otsuka, Roche, Servier, Shire, Schering Plough, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma.
Gage disclosed no relevant relationships with industry.

No comments:

Post a Comment