Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): An international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial

Why would you even expect blood pressure lowering to improve functional outcomes?  You are reducing the amount and quantity of oxygen carrying blood to the brain. Does not sound like a good idea. 

Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): An international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial


The LancetAnderson CS, et al. | March 11, 2019

In this trial that included a sample of nearly 2,200 alteplase-eligible adults with acute ischemic stroke and systolic blood pressure of ≥ 150 mmHg, researchers assessed intensive blood pressure lowering vs guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in these patients. A total of 1,081 participants were allocated to the intensive group and 1,115 were allocated to the guideline group. Among the 2,175 given intravenous alteplase, 1,466 received a standard dose. Intensive blood pressure lowering was identified as safe, but led to no improved clinical outcome vs guideline treatment—despite the observed reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. Results, thus, did not support a major shift towards this treatment for those receiving alteplase for mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke.
Read the full article on The Lancet

No comments:

Post a Comment