Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Emergent Stroke Care Within Reach for Nearly All in U.S.

 What this means is there is still a massive amount of work to do to get all stroke patients 100% recovered. The tyranny of low expectations is preventing 100% recovery as a goal for all survivors.  A lot of dead wood in stroke needs to be fired.

Emergent Stroke Care Within Reach for Nearly All in U.S.

Next question is staffing at those centers

Last Updated February 10, 2022

Nearly all Americans live within an hour of emergency care(NOT 100% RECOVERY) for acute stroke, even if only by telestroke services, a study found.

Fully 96% of the U.S. population had access to an emergency department with any acute stroke capabilities within 60 minutes, reported Kori S. Zachrison, MD, MSc, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, during the American Stroke Association's International Stroke Conference, held virtually and in person in New Orleans.

That represents an advance from 2011, when nearly 20% of the population didn't have timely access to a center where they could get thrombolytics, Zachrison and colleagues noted in a paper simultaneously published in JAMA Network Open.

"This increase likely reflects the extensive and ongoing work to improve stroke systems of care, including greater stroke center accreditation and expansion of telestroke capacity," they wrote.

While a major advancement, the findings suggest that the infrastructure part of advancing rapid stroke treatment might have just about peaked, said Cheryl Bushnell, MD, of the Comprehensive Stroke Center at Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, who is a spokesperson for the American Stroke Association.

However, "I think we might be struggling and maybe even going backward in having enough stroke experts for either the televideo or telestroke consults or working in the emergency department in person," she noted in an interview with MedPage Today monitored by her institution's media relations. "Having the processes in place is great, having the people is the challenge right now."

Other things that are outside of the hospitals' control, like getting people to immediately recognize stroke and seek medical care, and how long it actually takes for transport to the emergency department, are still a problem as well, she added.

Still, the analysis by Zachrison and colleagues turned up more than 13 million people (4% of the total U.S. population) who even in the best of circumstances wouldn't be able to reach emergency services with any acute stroke capability and some 5 million without 60-minute access to any emergency department at all.

"Although the smaller, critical access hospitals serving patients in rural areas are the most likely to benefit from telestroke services, they are currently the least likely to have them," Zachrison's group noted. "Addressing this care gap and other disparities in access will be critical to improving equitable access to acute stroke care for all Americans."

Another recent study documented disparities in driving distance for stroke care that particularly affect rural communities with a high proportion of minority residents.

The current study collated data from the 2019 National Emergency Department Inventory to identify all open emergency departments, which self-reported telestroke capacity and whether each was part of a hospital stroke center (including hospitals that can provide acute care even if patients require subsequent transfer). Calculation of timely access used 2020 U.S. Census data, looking for prehospital transport time of 60 minutes or less based on 2019 National Emergency Medical Services Information System data, considering EMS dispatch, response, scene times, and driving times.

Of the 5,587 emergency departments open in 2019, 46% were part of stroke centers and 45% had telestroke services. Of the 3,024 emergency departments not in a stroke center, 36% said they had telestroke capacity.

A comprehensive or thrombectomy-capable stroke center was within 60 minutes for 64% of the U.S. population.

Not surprisingly, the highest access to timely stroke care overall was in the mid-Atlantic region, with 99% of its population within 60 minutes of a telestroke-capable emergency department or a stroke center, and lowest in the Mountain West, at 91%.

A limitation to the study was the self-reporting of telestroke capabilities, which Zachrison's group did not confirm.

Disclosures

The study was funded by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and by funding from the National Foundation of Emergency Medicine.

Zachrison disclosed relationships with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, American Heart Association, Portola Pharmaceuticals, and CRICO.

Bushnell disclosed no relevant relationships with industry.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment