Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of corrected slack angle derived from 2D-SWE in quantitating muscle spasticity of stroke patients

 Survivors don't care about quantifying their spasticity, they want it cured. This was totally fucking useless.

Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of corrected slack angle derived from 2D-SWE in quantitating muscle spasticity of stroke patients

• Junyan Cao,
• Yang Xiao,
• Weihong Qiu,
• Yanling Zhang,
• Zulin Dou,
• Jie Ren,
• Rongqin Zheng,
• Hairong Zheng &
• Zhaocong Chen 

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation volume 19, Article number: 15 (2022) Cite this article

• Metrics details

Abstract

Background

To explore the feasibility of corrected slack angle acquired from two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) for quantitating the spasticity of medial gastrocnemius (MG) in stroke patients.

Methods

Consecutive stroke patients with spastic MG and matched healthy controls were recruited. Intra- and interobserver reliability of 2D-SWE measurement were evaluated, and the correlation between corrected slack angle and modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score was examined. The corrected slack angle before and after botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection was compared and its diagnostic performance in classifying the severity of spasticity were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The intra- (0.791 95% CI 0.432–0.932) and interobserver (0.751 95% CI 0.382–0.916) reliability of slack angle acquired with 2D-SWE were good. Significant correlation was found between corrected slack angle and MAS score (R = − 0.849, p < 0.001). The corrected slack angle increased after BoNT-A injection. The cutoff value of MAS ≥ 3 had the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93.33%). The positive predictive value (PPV) for classification of MAS ≥ 1+ and the negative predictive value (NPV) for classification of MAS ≥ 3 were greater than 90%.

Conclusion

2D-SWE was a reliable method to quantitate the post-stroke spasticity. The corrected slack angle had advantage in classifying the severity of spasticity, especially in early identification of mild spasticity and confirmation of severe spasticity.

Background

Spasticity is a common complication of central nervous system injury including cerebrovascular accident, brain trauma and spinal cord injury, etc. [1]. It has been estimated that spasticity affects approximately 19% to 45% of patients suffering from stroke [2, 3]. Quantitation of spasticity is necessary, in order to assess the impact of therapies and to determine appropriate medicine dosage. The modified Ashworth scale (MAS) is the most feasible measurement of spasticity in clinical practice [4]. However, its dependency on subjective assessment restricts its application. Magnetic resonance elastography is capable of objectively evaluating the spasticity of individual muscle [5], but it is limited by a variety of contraindications (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, claustrophobia).

Ultrasound elastography had been widely used to examine tissue elasticity in various organs, including breast [6], prostate [7] and liver [8]. Recently, it has been developed as a quantitative method for the evaluation of skeletal muscle. Several studies have attempted to investigate the mechanical properties of the spastic muscles in post-stroke patients [9,10,11]. However, various measurements (strain ratio [9], elasticity index [10], shear elastic modulus [11]) were reported because of different elastography techniques they used. As the newest modality of ultrasound elastography that uses acoustic radiation force and generate quantitative elastograms [12], although the technical assumption may not perfectly be met in skeletal muscle because skeletal muscle is not a homogeneous or isotropic material [13], two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) has also been used in evaluation of skeletal muscle cautiously. But its standard protocol is still lacking, which makes it difficult to achieve consensus on the cut-off elastic value of spastic muscles. Besides, the correlation between shear modulus and the clinical assessment such as MAS for stroke patients remains equivocal [14, 15].

Slack angle, defined as the angle of joint from where the muscle becomes tensioned and the shear modulus begins to rise as the joint was passively moved, has been a crucial parameter to characterize the mechanical property of skeletal muscles [16, 17]. Because skeletal muscle is a kind of active and deformable tissue, continuous 2D-SWE recording would make sense. It has been revealed that the slack angle of gastrocnemius occurred at a more plantarflexed angle in stroke patients than control subjects [18]. However, the slack angle was visually determined in previous studies [17,18,19]. Its inter- and intraobserver reliability and its correlation with clinical assessment have not been reported yet. Moreover, the inter-individual variability of muscle elasticity, caused by gender, age, physical activity and biological structure [20], may be a confounding factor when using the slack angle to evaluate the spasciticy of muscle. Instead of comparing with the spastic slack angle directly, we suggest that it would be reasonable to propose the corrected slack angle, which was performed a self-correction by subtracting the shear modulus of the unaffected muscle from that of the spastic muscle. It could be beneficial to rule out the confounding factors related to the passive extensibility of skeletal muscle.

Therefore, the present study aims to explore the feasibility of quantitating the spasticity of stroke patients with corrected slack angle acquired from 2D-SWE. For this purpose, whether corrected slack angle correlated with MAS and its change after botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection are examined, as well as its diagnostic performance for classifying the severity of spasticity.

More at link.