Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, October 11, 2023

Effects of combining robot-assisted therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor impairment, motor and daily function, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

By the time you're chronic there is no way to get all this equipment together for your rehab.

 Effects of combining robot-assisted therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor impairment, motor and daily function, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

  Ya-yun Lee
1,2
, Keh-chung Lin
3,4
, Hsiao-ju Cheng
3
, Ching-yi Wu
1,2*
, Yu-wei Hsieh
1,2
and Chih-kuang Chen
5,6

Abstract

Background:
 Robot-assisted therapy (RT) is a widely used intervention approach to enhance motor recovery inpatients after stroke, but its effects on functional improvement remained uncertain. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is one potential adjuvant intervention approach to RT that could directly activate the stimulated muscles and improve functional use of the paretic hand.
 
Methods:
 This was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Thirty-nine individuals with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to the RT combined with NMES (RT+ ES) or to RT with sham stimulation (RT+Sham) groups. The participants completed the intervention 90 to 100 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures included the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS). All outcome measures were assessed before and after intervention, and the UE-FMA, MAL, and SIS were reassessed at 3 months of follow-up.
 
Results:
 Compared with the RT+Sham group, the RT +ES group demonstrated greater improvements in wrist flexorMAS score, WMFT quality of movement, and the hand function domain of the SIS. For other outcome measures, both groups improved significantly after the interventions, but no group differences were found.
 
Conclusion:
 RT +ES induced significant benefits in reducing wrist flexor spasticity and in hand movement quality inpatients with chronic stroke.
Trial registration:
 ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01655446
Keywords:
 Stroke, Robot-assisted therapy, Electrical stimulation, Rehabilitation
* Correspondence: cywu@mail.cgu.edu.tw
1
Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of BehavioralSciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wenhua 1st Rd, Taoyuan, Taiwan
2
Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, TaiwanFull list of author information is available at the end of the article
JNER
 JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERINGAND REHABILITATION
© 2015 Lee et al.
 Open Access
 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tothe Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Lee
 et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
 (2015) 12:96
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0088-3

No comments:

Post a Comment