WHY WAS THIS RESEARCH DONE? Survivors don't give a flying fuck about cost! THEY WANT 100% RECOVERY! GET THERE or you're fired!
authors:
Farzaneh Miri
1
,
Nader Jahanmehr
2
,
3
, *
,
Reza Goudarzi
4
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies:
Vol.11, issue 4; e141716
published online:
July
29,
2024
article type:
Research Article
received:
October
11,
2023
how to cite:
Miri
F,
Jahanmehr
N,
Goudarzi
R.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rehabilitation Methods for
Stroke Survivors. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud.
2024;11(4):e141716. https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-141716.
Abstract
Background:
One of the challenges in
stroke management is how to provide rehabilitation services to stroke
patients in Iran.
Objectives:
This study aimed to
evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation
interventions for stroke patients in three settings: hospitals, stroke
units, and homes.
Methods:
This cross-sectional
study was conducted from the perspective of the health system. A Markov
model with a 20-year time horizon and 3-month cycles was used to analyze
costs and outcomes. Cost data were collected from 210 patients
undergoing rehabilitation in hospitals, homes, or stroke units. The
cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was conducted by calculating the
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using Tree Age software.
Results:
The average
rehabilitation cost for the home strategy (2955 ± 48.18) and stroke unit (11424, 7233) per QALY, respectively. The ICERs for stroke unit and home rehabilitation relative to hospital rehabilitation were 2145 per QALY, respectively.
Conclusions:
According to the
results, the home-based rehabilitation strategy is more cost-effective
than hospital and stroke unit rehabilitation strategies. Given the high
rates of stroke and its associated costs in Iran, it is suggested that
policymakers lay the groundwork for providing these services at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment