Deans' stroke musings: Posterior circulation stroke is associated with prolonged door-to-needle time

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Posterior circulation stroke is associated with prolonged door-to-needle time

Their conclusion is wrong. The conclusion should be to get away from subjective diagnosis of stroke to objective. It has nothing to do with posterior vs. anterior. The whole way of diagnosing stroke is wrong. Maybe these sixteen objective ways of diagnosis.
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00952.x/abstract;jsessionid=6A50E26F8ECC6B1A26277017DEAEAC1C.d02t02?

Background

Lack of recognition of early symptoms of acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke might delay timely diagnosis and treatment with tissue plasminogen activator.

Aims and hypothesis

We hypothesized that patients with posterior circulation stroke receive delayed thrombolytic treatment in comparison to anterior circulation stroke. We investigated the differences in times to evaluation or treatment between patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke and posterior circulation stroke in our aim to understand the barriers that might have caused these delays.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary academic centre with acute ischaemic stroke who were treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 4·5 h from symptom onset. We compared demographics, stroke severity, symptoms and signs, and time intervals among onset, emergency department arrival, emergency department physician evaluation, neurologist evaluation, brain imaging, and tissue plasminogen activator treatment in patients with anterior circulation stroke and posterior circulation stroke.

Results

Among 252 patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, 12% had posterior circulation stroke. Patients with posterior circulation stroke had significantly lower median baseline the National Institutes of Health and Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (P = 0·01), higher frequency of nausea (P < 0·01), vomiting (P < 0·01), dizziness (P < 0·01), and lower frequency of aphasia (P = 0·002) or neglect (P = 0·048). The emergency department physician evaluation-to-neurologist evaluation and door-to-needle intervals were significantly longer for posterior circulation stroke patients compared with anterior circulation stroke patients. The neurologist-to-needle time, however, was similar in the two groups. The presence of nausea and vomiting was associated with a longer time from emergency department evaluation to neurology evaluation and had a significant association with delayed treatment.

Conclusions

Posterior circulation stroke patients had a delay in neurology evaluation after initial emergency department evaluation and a delay in intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration compared with anterior circulation stroke patients. There may be difficulties in rapidly recognizing the symptoms of posterior circulation stroke, in contrast to anterior circulation stroke, in the emergency department.