Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Functional and Motor Outcome 5 Years After Stroke Is Equivalent to Outcome at 2 Months

Well shit, this shows you how pathetic our stroke rehab protocols are. We seem to have nothing that helps chronic survivors. Everyone is relying on the normal spontaneous recovery in the first 6-12 months and not able to get their patients any farther than that. That is truly pathetic. These people should never be paid for this lack of results.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2015/05/07/STROKEAHA.115.009421.abstract

Follow-Up of the Collaborative Evaluation of Rehabilitation in Stroke Across Europe

  1. Liesbet De Wit, PhD
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (S.M., G.V.,W.D.W., H.F.), Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (A.L.), Department of Neurosciences (V.T.), and Experimental Neurology and Leuven Research Institute for Neuroscience and Disease (LIND) (V.T.), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Fachklinik Herzogenaurach, Herzogenaurach, Germany (N.B., W.S.); University Hospital Pellenberg, Pellenberg, Belgium (E.D.); RehaClinic, Zurzach, Switzerland (A.R.G., W.J., B.S.); University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, United Kingdom (N.L.); Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium (K.P., L.D.W.); University of Central Lancashire, School of Health, Preston, United Kingdom (K.P.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium (V.T.); and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (V.T.).
  1. Correspondence to Sarah Meyer, MSc, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail sarah.meyer@faber.kuleuven.be

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Recovery of patients within the first 6 months after stroke is well documented, but there has been little research on long-term recovery. The aim of this study was to analyze functional and motor recovery between admission to rehabilitation centres and 5 years after stroke.
Methods—This follow-up of the Collaborative Evaluation of Rehabilitation in Stroke Across Europe study, included patients from 4 European rehabilitation centres. Patients were assessed on admission, at 2 and 6 months, and 5 years after stroke, using the Barthel Index, Rivermead Motor Assessment Gross Function, Leg and Trunk function, and Arm function. Linear mixed models were used, corrected for baseline characteristics. To account for the drop-out during follow-up, the analysis is likelihood-based (assumption of missingness at random).
Results—A total of 532 patients were included in this study, of which 238 were followed up at 5 years post stroke. Mean age at stroke onset was 69 (±10 SD) years, 53% were men, 84% had ischemic strokes, and 53% had left-sided motor impairment. Linear mixed model analysis revealed a significant deterioration for all 4 outcomes between 6 months and 5 years (P<0.0001). Scores at 2 months were not statistically significant different from scores at 5 years after stroke. Higher age (P<0.0001) and increasing stroke severity on admission (P<0.0001) negatively affected long-term functional and motor recovery.
Conclusions—Five-year follow-up revealed deterioration in functional and motor outcome, with a return to the level measured at 2 months. Increasing age and increasing stroke severity negatively affected recovery up to 5 years after stroke.

No comments:

Post a Comment