Whoopee. Suggestions for applying research that has been out there for years. 17 pages with no protocols, so useless. You 10 million yearly stroke survivors are on your own to figure out your recovery. No help from the stroke medical world. Start guessing.
action observation (89 posts back to May 2011)
motor imagery (31 posts back to January 2013)
Combined action observation and motor imagery therapy: a novel method for post-stroke motor rehabilitation
Jonathan R. Emerson*, Jack A. Binks, Matthew W. Scott, Ryan P. W. Kenny and Daniel L. Eaves* School of Health and Social Care , Teesside University, Middlesb rough, UK * Correspondence: Email: J.emerson@tees.ac.uk, d.eaves@tees.ac.uk; Tel: +44-1642- 342380. Abstract: Cerebral vascular accidents (strokes) are a leading cause of motor deficiency in millions of people worldwide. While a complex range of biological system s is affected following a stroke, in this paper we focus primarily on impairments of the motor system and the recovery of motor skills. We briefly review research that has assessed two types of mental practice, which are currently recommended in stroke rehabilitation. Namely, action observation (AO) therapy and motor imagery (MI) training. We highlight the strengths and limitations in bo th techniques, before making the case for combined action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) the rapy as a potentially more effective method. This is based on a growing body of multimodal brain imaging research showing advantages for combined AO + MI instructions over the two separate methods of AO and MI. Finally, we offer a series of suggestions and considerations(We don't want suggestions and considerations, we want protocols.) for how combined AO + MI therapy could be employed in neurorehabilitation.
No comments:
Post a Comment