Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, April 22, 2023

Quality and performance ‘National improvement board’ to be set up by NHS England

YOU need to get involved so when they start discussing stroke you can DEMAND 100% RECOVERY. Don't you  dare get bamboozled by medical staff and researchers that say it can't be done.  Send them to me.

Oops, I'm not playing by the polite rules of Dale Carnegie;  'How to Win Friends and Influence People'. 

Telling supposedly smart stroke medical persons they know nothing about stroke is a no-no even if it is true. 

Politeness will never solve anything in stroke. Yes, I'm a bomb thrower and proud of it. Someday a stroke 'leader' will try to ream me out for making them look bad by being truthful, I look forward to that day.

‘National improvement board’ to be set up by NHS England

NHS England has launched a new framework for quality improvement and delivery, including a national board that will pick a ‘small number of shared national priorities’.

The new document, announced to NHS chairs and chief executives this week, says NHSE will “establish a national improvement board, to agree the small number of shared national priorities on which NHSE, with providers and systems, will focus our improvement-led delivery work”.

It follows a review, led by South East regional director and former trust chief Anne Eden, which found NHSE’s “structures and governance do not yet optimise our ability to focus on a small number of shared national priorities effectively”.

The review says NHSE will, among other actions: 

  • Create a “national improvement board” to “agree a small number of shared national priorities and oversee the development and quality assure the impact of the NHS improvement approach”; 
  • “Set an expectation that all NHS providers, working in partnership with integrated care boards, will embed a quality improvement method aligned with the NHS improvement approach”;
  • “Incentivise a universal focus on embedding and sustaining improvement practice”, including with “regulatory incentives alongside clearer and more timely offers of support”; and
  • “Work with the [Care Quality Commission] to align the revised CQC well-led [inspection method] with the improvement approach”.

National management of NHS improvement work has been through several reorganisations in recent years, with Hugh McCaughey, the most recent national director of improvement in NHSE, leaving last year. Improvement functions were moved into the NHSE transformation directorate led by Tim Ferris. 

The review says NHSE will “consolidate capability and expertise into a national priority improvement function, whose role is to co-ordinate action”, but does not state where this will sit in its new structure, or who it will be led by.

It highlights how several trusts, including Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare Trust, and East London Foundation Trust, have used improvement methods to achieve better performance as well as morale. 

The review also looked at how NHSE works with poorly performing organisations. 

It found: “There are further opportunities to support our most challenged organisations and systems more consistently and effectively…

“People told us that NHS England’s recovery support programme works well and marks a positive shift from the previous special measures regime. We increasingly need to focus on earlier intervention for support and sustainable improvement.”

It says NHSE’s “support for challenged systems team” will work with its regional teams to ”more consistently co-ordinate intensive support”, including “collaboration with other regulators and royal colleges to ensure consistent support and no duplication”.

It will review its oversight framework – under which systems and trusts are rated from 1 (best) to 4 (worst) according to a range of measures – including “how national and regional teams more consistently support organisations in segment 3 and offer longer-term support to organisations exiting segment 4”.

No comments:

Post a Comment