Deans' stroke musings: Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, April 14, 2023

Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery

So you are going to have to wait longer to get 100% recovery protocols. Maybe by the time your children and grandchildren have strokes.

Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Up to 50% of the nearly 800,000 patients who experience a new or recurrent stroke each year in the United States fail to achieve full independence afterward.(Even worse, only 10% fully recover, an appalling failure rate. Which should cause every stroke hospital to be disbanded for incompetency and reconstituted with persons that will solve stroke. You can't let failure continue forever!) More effective approaches to enhance motor recovery following stroke are needed. This article reviews the rehabilitative principles and strategies that can be used to maximize post-stroke recovery.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Evidence dictates that mobilization should not begin prior to 24 hours following stroke, but detailed guidelines beyond this are lacking. Specific classes of potentially detrimental medications should be avoided in the early days post stroke. Patients with stroke who are unable to return home should be referred for evaluation to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Research suggests that a substantial increase in both the dose and intensity of upper and lower extremity exercise is beneficial. A clinical trial supports vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunct to occupational therapy for motor recovery in the upper extremity. The data remain somewhat mixed as to whether robotics, transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation are better than dose-matched traditional exercise. No current drug therapy has been proven to augment exercise poststroke to enhance motor recovery.

ESSENTIAL POINTS Neurologists will collaborate with rehabilitation professionals for several months following a patient’s stroke. Many questions still remain about the ideal exercise regimen to maximize motor recovery in patients poststroke. The next several years will likely bring a host of new research studies exploring the latest strategies to enhance motor recovery using poststroke exercise.(I doubt it! There is NO STRATEGY to solve stroke, everyone is running around like a chicken with their head chopped off, doing nothing useful. Stroke is a total disaster and nothing is out there to prevent that disaster.)

Address correspondence to Dr Michael W. O’Dell, MD, NeuroRehabilitation Consultants–New York City, c/o Manhattan Medicine, 300 East 56^th St, New York, NY 10021, mio2005@med.cornell.edu.

RELATIONSHIP DISCLOSURE: Dr O’Dell has received personal compensation in the range of $0 to $499 for serving as an officer or member of the board of directors for Franklin College of Indiana, and in the range of $500 to $4999 for serving on a scientific advisory or data safety monitoring board for Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC.