Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, September 23, 2023

Interpretable machine learning for prediction of clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke

Nothing here gets survivors recovered. I'd have you all fired!

Interpretable machine learning for prediction of clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke

  • Department of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea

Background and aims: Predicting the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial in a clinical setting for establishing suitable treatment plans. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the functional outcome of AIS patients and provides interpretable insights.

Methods: We included AIS patients from a multicenter stroke registry in this prognostic study. ML-based methods were utilized to predict 3-month functional outcomes, which were categorized as either favorable [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2] or unfavorable (mRS ≥ 3). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to identify significant features and interpret their contributions to the predictions of the model.

Results: The dataset comprised a derivation set of 3,687 patients and two external validation sets totaling 250 and 110 patients each. Among them, the number of unfavorable outcomes was 1,123 (30.4%) in the derivation set, and 93 (37.2%) and 32 (29.1%) in external sets A and B, respectively. Among the ML models used, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the best performance. It achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.790 (95% CI: 0.775–0.806) on the internal test set and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.733–0.848) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.798–0.948) on the two external test sets, respectively. The key features for predicting functional outcomes were the initial NIHSS, early neurologic deterioration (END), age, and white blood cell count. The END displayed noticeable interactions with several other features.

Conclusion: ML algorithms demonstrated proficient prediction for the 3-month functional outcome in AIS patients. With the aid of the SHAP method, we can attain an in-depth understanding of how critical features contribute to model predictions and how changes in these features influence such predictions.

No comments:

Post a Comment