Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, December 9, 2024

Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Where is the protocol located so survivors can bring it to their stroke medical 'professionals' attention? Top down dissemination of research is a complete fucking failure; bottom up is the way to go!

Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Ilaria Carpinella 1
Tiziana Lencioni 1*
Thomas Bowman 1
Rita Bertoni 1
Andrea Turolla 2
Maurizio Ferrarin 1 and 
Johanna Jonsdottir

Abstract 


Background: 

Robot-based rehabilitation for persons post-stroke may improve arm function and daily-life activities as measured by clinical scales, but its effects on motor strategies during functional tasks are still poorly investigated. This study aimed at assessing the effects of robot-therapy versus arm-specific physiotherapy in persons post-stroke on motor strategies derived from upper body instrumented kinematic analysis, and on arm function measured by clinical scales. 

Methods: 

Forty persons in the sub-acute and chronic stage post-stroke were recruited. This sample included all those subjects, enrolled in a larger bi-center study, who underwent instrumented kinematic analysis and who were randomized in Center 2 into Robot (R_Group) and Control Group (C_Group). R_Group received robot-assisted training. C_ Group received arm-specific treatment delivered by a physiotherapist. Pre- and post-training assessment included clinical scales and instrumented kinematic analysis of arm and trunk during a virtual untrained task simulating the transport of an object onto a shelf. Instrumented outcomes included shoulder/elbow coordination, elbow extension and trunk sagittal compensation. Clinical outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of Upper Extremity (FM-UE), modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). 

Results: 

R_Group showed larger post-training improvements of shoulder/elbow coordination (Cohensd= - 0.81, p = 0.019), elbow extension (Cohensd= - 0.71, p = 0.038), and trunk movement (Cohensd= - 1.12, p = 0.002). Both groups showed comparable improvements in clinical scales, except proximal muscles MAS that decreased more in R_Group (Cohensd= - 0.83, p = 0.018). Ancillary analyses on chronic subjects confirmed these results and revealed larger improvements after robot-therapy in the proximal portion of FM-UE (Cohens d = 1.16, p = 0.019). 

Conclusions: 

Robot-assisted rehabilitation was as effective as arm-specific physiotherapy in reducing(NOT RECOVERY!) arm impairment (FM-UE) in persons post-stroke, but it was more effective(If not 100% recovery, IT IS NOT EFFECTIVE!) in improving motor control strategies adopted during an untrained task involving vertical movements not practiced during training. Specifically, robot therapy induced larger improvements of shoulder/elbow coordination and greater reduction of abnormal trunk sagittal movements. The beneficial effects of robot therapy seemed more pronounced in chronic subjects. Future studies on a larger sample should be performed to corroborate present findings. Trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03530358. Registered 21 May 2018. Retrospectively registered. Keywords: Stroke, Robot therapy, Upper limb, Trunk, Kinematic analysis, Motor strategies 

No comments:

Post a Comment