Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Acute Infarct Core Volume Estimation on Noncontrast Computed Tomography With a Deep Learning Algorithm

 What good does this do to get survivors recovered? That's the whole point of stroke research! If you can't explain that you don't belong in stroke!

Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? I would like to know why you aren't solving stroke to 100% recovery, and what is your definition of competence in stroke? Swearing at me is allowed, I'll return the favor.

And you don't know about much faster ways to determine infarct or bleed?

The latest here:

Acute Infarct Core Volume Estimation on Noncontrast Computed Tomography With a Deep Learning Algorithm

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A simplified patient selection paradigm with noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) can reduce the time to reperfusion and widen the eligibility of acute ischemic stroke large vessel occlusions (LVOs) for endovascular therapy. The objectives of this article are (1) to develop, train, and internally validate a deep learning algorithm that estimates baseline infarct core volume (ICV) on NCCT in anterior circulation LVO patients, and (2) by using an external set, to ascertain how this algorithm's (aICV‐NCCT) predictive performance compares with Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score‐NCCT and ICV‐CT perfusion in its capacity to estimate the final infarct volume established on diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 24‐ to 48‐hour follow‐up.

METHODS

In the first phase, stroke activations with baseline NCCT and CT angiography were used to train an aICV‐NCCT. The algorithm was then internally validated using intraclass correlations and Intersection over Union. In the external set, patients with LVO treated with endovascular therapy achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b and available baseline NCCT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion were included.

RESULTS

A total of 2858 studies of patients with stroke alerts were used for training (80%) and internal validation (20%). We obtained a high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78; CI, 0.73–0.83) and an acceptable Intersection over Union of 0.24 on the internal validation set. The external set consisted on 230 patients with an LVO. When predicting final infarct volume on the external set, our aICV‐NCCT was similar to ICV‐CT perfusion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.50 versus 0.54; P = 0.764) and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score‐NCCT (rs, −0.41; P = 0.436).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning algorithm that demonstrates an at least equivalent performance to CT perfusion in estimating core volume on acute stroke imaging studies in patients with suspected anterior circulation LVO strokes. The algorithm's robust performance holds significant potential in settings with limited access to advanced imaging technologies across diverse healthcare environments.

Graphical Abstract

image



No comments:

Post a Comment