So you described a problem; WHAT THE FUCK IS THE SOLUTION? No solution, useless research, I'd fire you all.Very similar to this useless research in September 2022:
The latest here:
Association of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio with mortality in older stroke survivors
Jie Huang1, Xiaowei Zhang2, Luyao Ding1, Jiaxiang Yu3 and Mingshen Lin2*
1Department of Cardiology, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China
2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China
Edited by
Hipólito Nzwalo, University of Algarve, Portugal
Reviewed by
Yahia Imam, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Sennur Delibas Kati, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye
*Correspondence
Mingshen Lin, linmingshen@wmu.edu.cn
Received 14 April 2025
Accepted 12 May 2025
Published 30 May 2025
Citation
Huang J, Zhang X, Ding L, Yu J and Lin M (2025) Association of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio with mortality in older stroke survivors. Front. Aging Neurosci. 17:1611289. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1611289
Background: The neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) functions as an integrative marker representing inflammatory response and nutritional health. However, its association with mortality in elderly stroke survivors has not been explored.
Methods: This cohort study analyzed data from 1,026 elderly stroke survivors in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2018). The association of NPAR with mortality was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression, restricted cubic splines (RCS), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were also performed.
Results: During the 6.65-year median follow-up, elevated NPAR showed independent associations with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Quartile-based analysis revealed 69 and 87% greater mortality hazards for the highest versus lowest NPAR groups, respectively. RCS analysis revealed a non-linear threshold effect at NPAR = 14.5, beyond which the risk of all-cause mortality increased sharply. NPAR demonstrated stable predictive accuracy, with time-dependent AUC ranging from 0.664 to 0.607 for all-cause mortality and 0.652-0.609 for cardiovascular mortality over 3-10 years. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistency across different sex, BMI, lifestyle habits, and comorbidity categories.
Conclusion: This study underscores a strong positive correlation between NPAR and prognosis in older adult stroke survivors in the United States, indicating its potential as a novel biomarker for prognostic assessment.
No comments:
Post a Comment