Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Citicoline - Agent No Help in Brain Trauma

This is what is in CerAxon that Diane from Pink House on the Corner thought helped Bob.
A positive review for stroke here:
So ask your doctor why it would be helpful for stroke but not TBI.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/CriticalCare/HeadTrauma/36050
Citicoline -- a chemical that occurs naturally in the body and is available in the U.S. as a nutraceutical -- did not improve outcomes among patients with traumatic brain injury, the randomized COBRIT trial showed.
Functional and cognitive outcomes assessed with a battery of tests 90 days after the injury were not significantly different between the patients who received citicoline and those who received placebo, according to Ross Zafonte, DO, of Harvard Medical School in Boston, and colleagues.
There were also no differences in any secondary outcome, including survival, the researchers reported in the Nov. 21 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The findings call into question the use of citicoline around the world, they said.
The agent is approved for use in patients with traumatic brain injuries in 59 countries. Preclinical studies and some small clinical trials have suggested that citicoline has potential neuroprotective effects and may enhance neurological repair after a brain injury, but most randomized trials in patients with traumatic brain injury have failed to show any benefit.
"The absence of an effect in prior trials and in COBRIT may be attributable either to the therapy simply being ineffective or to the heterogeneous pathophysiological nature of traumatic brain injury," Zafonte and colleagues wrote. "This would suggest that the mechanisms of action of drugs used in future ... trials would need to be tested in specific subtypes of traumatic brain injury, where they are likely to have a positive effect."
The COBRIT trial was a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial that included 1,213 patients treated at one of eight U.S. level 1 trauma centers for a nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. The seriousness of the injuries ranged from complicated mild traumatic brain injury to severe injury.
The patients received either daily enteral or oral citicoline 2,000 mg or matching placebo starting within 24 hours of the injury.
The primary outcome was a global measure of functional and cognitive status -- the TBI Clinical Trials Network Core Battery, which includes nine scales -- at 90 days.
The trial was stopped for futility at the fourth interim analysis. The primary outcome was no different between the citicoline and placebo groups at 90 days (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15). The severity of injury did not affect the results.
The rate of a favorable outcome for each of the nine scales of the assessment ranged from 35.4% to 86.5% in the citicoline group and from 35.6% to 84% in the placebo group, with no between-group differences.
In an accompanying editorial, Robert Ruff, MD, PhD, and Ronald Riechers II, MD, of the Cleveland VA Medical Center, noted that among the possible reasons citicoline did not improve outcomes was the fact that there are many different mechanisms of injury involved in brain trauma.
"Traumatic brain injury can have regional pathology attributable to hematomas, edema, infarction, penetrating injury, and cerebral contusions. Diffuse injury mechanisms include diffuse edema, activation of inflammatory cytokines, release of excitatory neurotransmitters, extracellular potassium-induced membrane depolarization, and diffuse axonal injury," they wrote.
"Hence, optimal treatment ... may require that multiple agents and modalities be used to address all of the regional and widespread injury processes that occur in traumatic brain injury," they wrote.

No comments:

Post a Comment