Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, October 22, 2018

Early Cognitive Scores May Predict Long-Term Outcomes After Stroke

You'll have to aggressively go after your doctor to get you back up to your baseline cognition rather than accepting the tyranny of low expectations your doctor is trying to get you to accept. Don't settle for anything less than 100% recovery.  Screaming may be required, your doctor should feel embarrassed that they KNOW NOTHING on how to get you back to 100%. 

When I was given the orientation portion(date, month, year, day, place, and city.) after spending 3 days in the ER and step down units, I failed completely.

Early Cognitive Scores May Predict Long-Term Outcomes After Stroke

Low MoCA scores post-stroke tied to cognitive and functional impairment 3 years later

  • by Contributing Writer, MedPage Today
  • This article is a collaboration between MedPage Today® and:
    Medpage Today

Action Points

  • Early administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to patients with stroke predicted cognitive and functional outcome out to 3 years in two prospective European cohort studies.
  • While the populations studied tended to have milder strokes, the authors concluded that the ease of administering this assessment tool could help to identify stroke patients that might benefit from rehabilitation strategies.
Early post-stroke test scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) predicted long-term cognitive and functional outcomes, a pooled analysis of two European studies found.
Patients assessed with a MoCA score of <26 within 7 days of stroke were five times more likely to have cognitive impairment in at least one cognitive domain and functional impairment 3 years later, reported Martin Dichgans, MD, of Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich, Germany, and co-authors, writing online in Neurology.
"This test should be used to screen people with stroke and to counsel them and their families about long-term prognosis and also to identify those who would most benefit from interventions that could improve their outcomes," Dichgans said in a statement.(Fucking tyranny of low expectations here.)
While MoCA has been used to evaluate cognitive function in different stroke settings, this study set out to investigate whether administering the test within 7 days after stroke predicted long-term outcomes independently from pre-morbid cognitive status, demographic characteristics, or stroke severity.
The analysis leveraged data from two prospective hospital-based studies that were planned in parallel. In total, researchers studied 274 stroke patients: 125 patients from the DEDEMAS (Determinants of Dementia After Stroke) study in Germany and 149 patients from STROKDEM (Study of Factors Influencing Post Stroke Dementia) in France. Patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2014, and over 95% had ischemic strokes. The median admission NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the cohorts was 2, indicating a large proportion of patients with minor stroke (only 75 patients had NIHSS scores >3).
MoCA was administered within 7 days after stroke symptom onset, with cognitive impairment defined by a MoCA score <26. All patients had a comprehensive evaluation of cognitive and functional outcome in face-to-face interviews during follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 36 months after stroke. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, baseline Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) score, and NIHSS score at admission.
About 43% of patients in DEDEMAS and 44% in STROKDEM had a MoCA score <26. Pooled analyses showed that a baseline MoCA score <26 was associated with cognitive impairment at 3-year follow-up, defined by neuropsychological testing (OR 5.30, 95% CI 2.75–10.22) and by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score ≥0.5 (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.53–4.18).
Baseline MoCA score <26 also was linked to functional impairment at 3 years, defined by modified Rankin Scale score >2 (OR 5.03, 95% CI 2.20–11.51) and by Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score <8 (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.40–4.38). Baseline MoCA score <26 was also tied to mortality (HR 7.24, 95% CI 1.99–26.35) across the follow-up period.
MoCA increased the area under the curve for predicting cognitive impairment (defined by neuropsychological testing; 0.81 versus 0.72, P=0.01) and functional impairment (defined by modified Rankin score >2; 0.88 versus 0.84, P=0.047).
Applicability to Other Populations?
While these results are promising, it's not clear they can be applied to other patient populations, observed Elisabeth Marsh, MD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and Franz Fazekas, MD, of Medical University of Graz, Austria, writing in an accompanying editorial.
"The mean admission NIHSS score, a measure of stroke severity, was low for the cohort: only 2," they wrote. "The authors attempt to address this by stratifying their analysis (by NIHSS score <3 versus greater) without finding significant differences; however, given that the majority of their population had low scores, results may be different for a patient presenting initially with a more severe stroke."
Applying and interpreting MoCA also will be more difficult in patients with severe strokes, the editorial added.
The analysis also excluded patients with a known history of dementia before infarction and did not take into account possible consequences of post-stroke rehabilitation or cognitive therapy. "Therefore, despite the temptation to use the MoCA to identify patients for aggressive rehabilitation paradigms meant to reduce long-term morbidity, it remains unknown whether such interventions will be effective in modifying outcome or whether in these cases the MoCA is merely a tool for stratification of poor prognosis," Marsh and Fazekas noted.
Dichgans and co-authors also listed other study limitations, including attrition bias -- i.e., that people not examined by face-to-face follow-up visits may be more likely to have dementia. In addition, pre-stroke cognitive function was assessed only by the IQCODE questionnaire and residual confounding is possible.
Despite these limitations, "our sample is representative of patients who are most likely to benefit from targeted prevention," the researchers wrote. "Given the brevity of the test and its feasibility in the setting of acute stroke, our findings support the use of the MoCA as a routine clinical tool to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from close monitoring."
The German portion of the study was funded by the German Research Foundation, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, European Union, and Vascular Dementia Research Foundation. The French portion of the study was funded by the French Health Ministry and French Foundation for the Head and Arteries.
Dichgans and co-authors reported having no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.
Marsh and Fazekas reported financial relationships with Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Perceptive Informatics, Roche, Teva-Ratiopharm, and Actelion.
  • Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine (Retired), Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN, Nurse Planner
last updated

No comments:

Post a Comment