Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain!Just think of all the trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 493 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal.

Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
My back ground story is here:

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

“It’s Lonely”: Patients’ Experiences of the Physical Environment at a Newly Built Stroke Unit

Well shit, you mean you didn't take into account research showing nature scenes even in a painting were helpful.

“It’s Lonely”: Patients’ Experiences of the Physical Environment at a Newly Built Stroke Unit 

First Published October 18, 2018 Research Article

The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of the physical environment at a newly built stroke unit.

For a person who survives a stroke, life can change dramatically. The physical environment is essential for patients’ health and well-being. To reduce infections, a majority of new healthcare facilities mainly have a single-room design. However, in the context of stroke care, knowledge of how patients experience the physical environment, particularly their experience of a single-room design, is scarce.

This study used a qualitative design. Patients (n = 16) participated in semistructured individual interviews. Data were collected in December 2015 and February 2017 in Sweden; interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.

Two main themes were identified: (i) incongruence exists between community and privacy and (ii) connectedness with the outside world provides distraction and a sense of normality. In single rooms, social support was absent and a sense of loneliness was expressed. Patients were positively distracted when they looked at nature or activities that went on outside their windows.

The physical environment is significant for patients with stroke. This study highlights potential areas for architectural improvements in stroke units, primarily around designing communal areas with meeting places and providing opportunities to participate in the world outside the unit. A future challenge is to design stroke units that support both community and privacy. Exploring patients’ experiences could be a starting point when designing new healthcare environments and inform evidence-based design.
Stroke affects a large number of people, and the subsequent rehabilitation and care are challenging. In Sweden, as in most high-income countries, almost all people with stroke are cared for at special stroke units (Riksstroke, 2015). There are evidence-based guidelines for the care provided at stroke units, such as early and individual-based mobilization, frequent and accurate assessment of health status, and well-developed teamwork (Ringelstein et al., 2013; Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration [SUTC], 2013). However, despite the fact that studies in other fields show that the physical environment is important and can influence the patient’s health outcomes and how care is provided (Ulrich et al., 2008), little is known about the physical environment’s contribution to the quality of care at stroke units. In this study, we describe how patients experience the physical environment at a stroke unit that has been rebuilt according to a new single-room design. Such an investigation is important because the majority of new healthcare facilities are built with a predominantly single-room design (Joint Commission, 2018). Recently, a study showed that patients in a newly built stroke unit with a single-room design spend more time being inactive and alone compared to patients in an older multibed room design (Anåker, von Koch, Sjöstrand, Bernhardt, & Elf, 2017). However, how patients experience being cared for in single-room units remains unexplored.
As an important part of the rehabilitation process at stroke units, the physical environment has recently been highlighted as an important factor in stimulating both cognitive and social activities among patients (Janssen et al., 2014; White, Bartley, Janssen, Jordan, & Spratt, 2015). According to Harris, McBride, Ross, and Curtis (2002), the physical environment can be described as the ambient environment (e.g., lighting, noise levels, and air quality); architectural features (e.g., layout of hospital); the size and shape of rooms and placement of windows; and interior design features (e.g., furnishing and artwork). All dimensions are important for supporting care and helping patients return to health and well-being. In nursing, the concept of the environment has traditionally been referred to as all that surrounds the patient; there is constant interaction between the patient and the environment (Meleis, 2017).
Ulrich (1991) argued that to promote well-being, the physical environment should be designed to support patient care by providing a sense of control, access to social support, and access to positive distraction. Researchers have examined several areas in which the physical environment can impact patients’ health outcomes; it has been found that sound and light (Huisman, Morales, van Hoof, & Kort, 2012) as well as the ability to experience nature (Ulrich et al., 2008) can affect health and well-being. Research has also shown that high levels of attractiveness, in the form of colorful contemporary furnishings and artwork, for example, may reduce patients’ anxiety (Becker & Douglass, 2008). The physical environment can also provide opportunities for activities and social interactions, for example, by providing access to communal areas with books, games, and computers; having access to these opportunities for interaction can be an important prerequisite for recovery after a stroke (Janssen et al., 2014; White et al., 2015).
Based on the knowledge that the physical environment can contribute to health and well-being, the concept of evidence-based design has been established and is increasingly attracting attention. Evidence-based design incorporates research to achieve the best possible health outcomes for patients, staff, and visitors (Hamilton & Watkins, 2009; Ulrich, Berry, Quan, & Parish, 2010). To gain a better understanding of the importance of the physical environment, individual experiences of the environment need to be studied further. This need for research applies especially when the trend is to go exclusively to single rooms.
To gain a better understanding of the importance of the physical environment, individual experiences of the environment need to be studied further.
Around the world, new healthcare environments are built primarily using a single-room design (Joint Commission, 2018). Studies have shown that patients treated in single rooms have a lower incidence of both airborne and contact-related infections (Simon, Maben, Murrells, & Griffiths, 2016; Ulrich et al., 2008) and confusions (Caruso, Guardian, Tiengo, dos Santos, & Junior, 2014) than patients in multibed rooms. Reduced noise levels in single rooms improve communication between patients and staff (Ulrich et al., 2008). Studies have also shown that patients appreciate being cared for in single rooms because these rooms provide a personal sphere without disturbing elements (Maben et al., 2015; Persson, Anderberg, & Ekwall, 2015). However, the sense of loneliness and isolation that patients experience as a result of a single-room design compared with multibedded units is receiving more attention (Persson et al., 2015: Singh, Subhan, Krishnan, Edwards, & Okeke, 2016).
The present study focuses on patients who have suffered a stroke. Stroke can affect any neurological function, for example, it can cause visual impairment and memory loss, and it can impact a person’s daily life (Elf, Eriksson, Johansson, von Koch, & Ytterberg, 2016; Langhorne, Bernhardt, & Kwakkel, 2011). Shortly after a stroke, increased engagement in physical activities targeting mobility may result in reduced impairment (Veerbeek et al., 2014).
To live independently and manage their daily lives at home, all stroke patients should be treated in stroke units. A stroke unit is an organized and highly specialized unit that provides complete care for stroke patients and constitutes a geographically defined unit in the hospital (SUTC, 2013). A person who receives care in a stroke unit is less likely to have complications caused by immobility, such as venous thromboembolism or chest infections, compared to a patient who receives care in a general ward (Govan, Langhorne, & Weir, 2007). The care at stroke units focuses on acute medical interventions and early rehabilitation, which are provided by a multiprofessional team (Riksstroke, 2015). Stroke guidelines recommend starting rehabilitation early to regain functions such as the abilities to walk, talk, and read (Ringelstein et al., 2013; SUTC, 2013).
Research on patients at stroke units has focused mainly on aspects such as where patients spend their days as well as the types of activities and interactions they engage in (Bernhardt, Dewey, Thrift, & Donnan, 2004; West & Bernhardt, 2012). Recently, we had the opportunity to compare patients’ behavior in a stroke unit before and after the unit underwent reconstruction. The comparison showed that patients’ activities and interactions varied between the old and the new units and that these variations could be related to the difference in design. In the new stroke unit, the patients spent more time alone in their rooms, were less active, and had fewer interactions compared with the patients in the old unit. One explanation could be the transformation from mainly multibed rooms to single rooms (Anåker et al., 2017). Nevertheless, we need a deeper understanding of how the physical environment affects patients and the quality of care at stroke units (Campbell, Roland, & Buetow, 2000). A well-designed physical environment can be defined as an environment that can contribute to social, psychological, spiritual, physical, and behavioral care (Jonas & Chez, 2004). However, the physical environment’s design and its impact on health and care are rarely the focus of the studies conducted at stroke units.
In summary, a well-designed, stimulating, and attractive healthcare environment is a key factor in patient care. Observations of patients’ activities and interactions during stroke care are important; however, such studies do not reveal how patients experience an environment and what meaning they give to that environment. How patients experience the physical environment in stroke units in general, and stroke units with single-room designs in particular, remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of the physical environment at a newly built stroke unit, and the knowledge generated by this investigation can inform the design of new stroke units.
In summary, a well-designed, stimulating, and attractive healthcare environment is a key factor in patient care.

No comments:

Post a Comment