So that brings up an immediate question. 'Should metformin be immediately given to stroke patients as part of their hyperacute therapy?' WHOM will answer that question? Specific names needed. You can see the fucking incompetence of all the stroke medical world in that nothing seems to have been done with this in the past 4.5 years.
You could stay forever young (or young for a long time) with this diabetes drug
Dec. 2015
In this one is this line:The drug, which is cheaply available for just $0.16 a day, works by boosting the number of oxygen molecules released into a cell, which in turn seems to benefit the robustness and longevity of the body’s basic building blocks. (This would seem to be much easier and faster than HBOT. I'm requesting this at my next stroke, my doctor won't know what hit her when I tell her how to treat me.)
My list of 31 things I was going to demand after my next stroke. I guess metformin isn't in there.
The latest here:
Association of pre-stroke metformin use, stroke severity, and thrombolysis outcome
Downloads
0
Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate whether pretreatment with metformin (MET) is associated
with less stroke severity and better outcome after intravenous
thrombolysis (IVT), we analyzed a cohort of 1919 stroke patients with
type-2 diabetes in a multicenter exploratory analysis.
Methods:
Data from patients with diabetes affected by ischemic stroke treated
with IVT were collected within the European Thrombolysis in Ischemic
Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration. We applied propensity score
matching (PSM) to obtain balanced baseline characteristics of patients
treated with and without MET.
Results:
Of 1919 stroke patients with type-2 diabetes who underwent IVT, 757
(39%) had received MET before stroke (MET+), whereas 1162 (61%) had not
(MET-). MET+ patients were younger with a male preponderance.
Hypercholesterolemia and pretreatment with statins, antiplatelets or
antihypertensives were more common in the MET+ group. After PSM, the two
groups were well balanced with respect to demographic and clinical
aspects. Stroke severity on admission (NIHSS 10.0 ± 6.7 vs. 11.3 ± 6.5),
3-months degree of independence on modified Rankin Scale (mRS): 2 [IQR
1.0, 4.0] vs. 3 [IQR 1.0, 4.0] as well as mortality (12.5% vs. 18%) were
significantly lower in the MET+ group. The frequency of symptomatic
intracerebral hemorrhages did not differ between groups. HbA1c levels
were well balanced between both groups.
Conclusions:
Stroke patients with diabetes on treatment with MET receiving IVT had
less severe strokes on admission and a better functional outcome at 3
months. This suggests a protective effect of MET resulting in less
severe strokes as well as beneficial thrombolysis outcome.
- Received April 19, 2019.
- Accepted in final form January 6, 2020.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
No comments:
Post a Comment