Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Each minute delay of IV thrombolysis worsens survival, functional outcomes in stroke

UNTIL YOU KNOW EXACTLY HOW FAST IT HAS TO BE TO GET 100% RECOVERY  JUST SHUT UP WITH THIS FEARMONGRING. This is a totally fucking useless piece of research, you all need to be fired. Tell me exactly why you should stay employed when you don't solve the problem in front of you?

Each minute delay of IV thrombolysis worsens survival, functional outcomes in stroke

For every 1-minute delay in delivery of IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke, the chance of survival decreased by 0.6%, researchers reported.
As door-to-needle time increased, so too did the risk for intracerebral hemorrhage and worse 90-day functional outcomes.

Source: Adobe Stock.
“Our findings highlight that door-to-needle time is a key factor in achieving favorable outcomes after a stroke, emphasizing the importance of constant improvement of in-hospital treatment routines,” David Darehed, PhD, postdoctoral researcher in the department of public health and clinical medicine at Umeå University, Sweden, and colleagues wrote. “The odds of worse outcomes per minute may seem small but translates to large numbers considering greater decreases in door-to-needle time combined with the commonness of the disease.”
The nationwide registry-based study published in Stroke assessed adult patients in Sweden admitted for stroke who underwent IV thrombolysis between 2010 and 2017 (n = 14,132; median age, 74 years; median NIH Stroke Scale score, 8 points). Researchers compared survival, intracranial hemorrhage and functional outcomes with the door-to-needle times for each patient.
Researchers observed that from 2010 to 2017, door-to-needle time decreased from approximately 65 to 38 minutes. The median door-to-needle time during the study period was 47 minutes.
Per-minute delay in door-to-needle IV thrombolysis for stroke was associated with:
  • lower odds of 90-day survival (OR = 0.994; 95% CI, 0.992-0.996);
  • higher odds of intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours (OR = 1.003; 95% CI, 1-1.006);
  • worse functional outcomes for daily living (OR = 1.003; 95% CI, 1.001-1.005);
  • worse functional outcomes for living conditions (OR = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.002-1.005); and
  • worse mobility at 3 months (OR = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.003-1.006).
“The finding that higher age, higher NIH Stroke Scale, and longer onset-to-door time was related with shorter door-to-needle time, explain why the results showed only after adjustment for confounders,” the researchers wrote. “Before 2014, patients older than 80 years were not eligible for IV thrombolysis; hence, most of these patients were included in the later part of the study, which may explain the relationship for age. Delays related to NIH Stroke Scale and onset-to-door time should be possible to target in future quality improvement efforts aiming to achieve a quick and correct stroke diagnosis.”

No comments:

Post a Comment