Oh damn, you didn't do the research well enough that you had to call for further research, labeling it preliminary is not a valid excuse. So go ask your stroke hospital if further research was ever done and the results. It has only been 9 years. If we had anything other than fucking failures of stroke associations we could have accomplished further research.
Has your hospital done anything with these?
DO YOU PREFER YOUR HOSPITAL INCOMPETENCE NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING?
vibration (29)
Vibroacoustic Therapy (2)
vibrotactile (1)
vibrotactile feedback (5)
focal muscle vibration (1)
Effects of Sensory Cueing on Voluntary Arm Use for Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Preliminary Study
Kenneth N. Fong, PhD, OTR, Pinky C. Lo, BSc, Yoyo S. Yu, BSc, Connie K. Cheuk, BSc, Toto H. Tsang, BSc, Ash S. Po, BSc, Chetwyn C. Chan, PhD
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:15-23.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:15-23.
ABSTRACT.
Objective:
To investigate the effect of a 2-week program of sensory cueing in which vibration induces the use of the paretic upper extremity in participants with chronic stroke in the community.
Design:
A single-group longitudinal study.
Setting:
Self-help organizations.
Participants:
A convenience sample of 16 community residents (N=16) with chronic unilateral stroke and mild to moderate upper extremity impairment stratified by the severity of their paretic arm function, measured by using the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE).
Interventions:
Participants engaged in repetitive upper-extremity task practice for 2 weeks while wearing an ambulatory sensory cueing device on their affected hand for 3 hours a day.
Main Outcome Measures:
Evaluations were conducted on the 3 occasions of pretest (1 day before training), post test(immediately after training), and follow-up test (2 weeks after training) by using the following behavioral measures of paretic upper extremity performance: the Action Research Arm Test(ARAT), the Box and Block Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the FTHUE, power and pinch grips, the Motor Activity Log assessment of arm use, and kinematic data obtained from the device.
Results:
Significant differences were found in ARAT and FMA scores among the pretest, post test, and follow-up evaluations. The lower functioning group achieved a more significant increase in overall upper-extremity score than in the hand score for the FMA.
Conclusion:
A combination of sensory cueing and movement-based strategies is useful and feasible in improving pa-retic upper-extremity performance in participants with chronic stroke; however, additional studies with a larger sample size and longer treatment period in a randomized controlled trial would be beneficial.
Key Words:
Chronic stroke; Learned nonuse; Paretic upper extremity; Rehabilitation; Sensory cueing; Voluntary arm use.©
2011 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
To investigate the effect of a 2-week program of sensory cueing in which vibration induces the use of the paretic upper extremity in participants with chronic stroke in the community.
Design:
A single-group longitudinal study.
Setting:
Self-help organizations.
Participants:
A convenience sample of 16 community residents (N=16) with chronic unilateral stroke and mild to moderate upper extremity impairment stratified by the severity of their paretic arm function, measured by using the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE).
Interventions:
Participants engaged in repetitive upper-extremity task practice for 2 weeks while wearing an ambulatory sensory cueing device on their affected hand for 3 hours a day.
Main Outcome Measures:
Evaluations were conducted on the 3 occasions of pretest (1 day before training), post test(immediately after training), and follow-up test (2 weeks after training) by using the following behavioral measures of paretic upper extremity performance: the Action Research Arm Test(ARAT), the Box and Block Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the FTHUE, power and pinch grips, the Motor Activity Log assessment of arm use, and kinematic data obtained from the device.
Results:
Significant differences were found in ARAT and FMA scores among the pretest, post test, and follow-up evaluations. The lower functioning group achieved a more significant increase in overall upper-extremity score than in the hand score for the FMA.
Conclusion:
A combination of sensory cueing and movement-based strategies is useful and feasible in improving pa-retic upper-extremity performance in participants with chronic stroke; however, additional studies with a larger sample size and longer treatment period in a randomized controlled trial would be beneficial.
Key Words:
Chronic stroke; Learned nonuse; Paretic upper extremity; Rehabilitation; Sensory cueing; Voluntary arm use.©
2011 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
No comments:
Post a Comment