Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, May 16, 2025

Increased sedentary behavior is associated with neurodegeneration and worse cognition in older adults over a 7-year period despite high levels of physical activity

Sedentary time wouldn't exist if you had 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS! If you can't figure that out; GET THE HELL OUT OF STROKE!

 Increased sedentary behavior is associated with neurodegeneration and worse cognition in older adults over a 7-year period despite high levels of physical activity

Marissa A. Gogniat1,2,3 Omair A. Khan4,5 Judy Li1 Chorong Park6
W. Hudson Robb1 Panpan Zhang1,4 Yunyi Sun1,4 Elizabeth E. Moore1,7
Michelle L. Houston1,8 Kimberly R. Pechman1 Niranjana Shashikumar1
L. Taylor Davis1,2,9 Dandan Liu1,4 Bennett A. Landman1,2,9,10,11 Keith R. Cole1,12
Corey J. Bolton1,13 Katherine A. Gifford1,2,14 Timothy J. Hohman1 Kelsie Full1,15
Angela L. Jefferson1,2,16
1 Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer’s Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
2 Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
3 Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
4 Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
5 Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Medical Research Building III, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
6 College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Jongno District, Seoul, South Korea
7 Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
8 Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
9 Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
10 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
11 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
12 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
13 Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
14 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
15 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
16 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Correspondence
Angela L. Jefferson, Vanderbilt Memory and
Alzheimer’s Center, 3319 West End Avenue,
8th Floor, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Email: angela.jefferson@vumc.org
Statistical Analysis conducted by Omair A.
Khan, MAS, Yunyi Sun, MA, Panpan Zhang,
PhD and Dandan Liu, PhD, Department of

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sedentary behavior may be a modifiable risk factor for Alzheimer’s
disease (AD). We examined how sedentary behavior relates to longitudinal brain
structure and cognitive changes in older adults.
METHODS: Vanderbilt Memory and Aging Project participants (n = 404) completed
actigraphy (7 days), neuropsychological assessment, and 3T brain MRI over a 7-year
period. Cross-sectional and longitudinal linear regressions examined sedentary time
in relation to brain structure and cognition. Models were repeated testing for effect
modification by apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 status.
RESULTS: In cross-sectional models, greater sedentary time related to a smaller AD-
neuroimaging signature (β = -0.0001, p = 0.01) and worse episodic memory (β = -0.001,
p = 0.003). Associations differed by APOE-ε4 status. In longitudinal models, greater
sedentary time related to faster hippocampal volume reductions (β = -0.1, p = 0.008)
and declines in naming (β = -0.001, p = 0.03) and processing speed (β = -0.003, p = 0.02;
β = 0.01, p = 0.01).
DISCUSSION: Results support the importance of reducing sedentary time, particularly
among aging adults at genetic risk for AD

No comments:

Post a Comment