Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, May 5, 2025

Sitting Time, Leisure-Time Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality Among US Stroke Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study From the NHANES 2007 to 2018

Sedentary time wouldn't exist if you had 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS! If you can't figure that out; GET THE HELL OUT OF STROKE!


Sitting Time, Leisure-Time Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality Among US Stroke Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study From the NHANES 2007 to 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Stroke survivors are highly sedentary and engage in minimal physical activity. This study aimed to investigate the independent and joint effects of daily sitting time and leisure-time physical activity on survival among stroke survivors.

METHODS:

The nationally representative cohort included 1446 stroke survivors (weighted population, 6 968 723) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2018. Mortality data were obtained through December 31, 2019. Leisure-time physical activity was categorized as inactive (0 min/wk), insufficiently active (1 to <150 min/wk), and sufficiently active (≥150 min/wk). Daily sitting time was categorized as <6, 6 to <8, and ≥8 h/d. Survival analyses of all-cause and specific mortality were performed by weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS:

This cohort study comprised 55.0% females, 68.7% non-Hispanic White, and had a weighted mean (SE) age of 64.6 (0.5) years. Overall, 70.3% were inactive, 42.3% sat at least 8 h/d, and 34.9% were both inactive and sat at least 8 h/d. During a median of 5.2 years of follow-up, 494 deaths occurred, including 171 associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 323 associated with non-CVD. Active stroke survivors had a lower risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26 [95% CI, 0.17–0.40]), CVD (HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.13–0.53]), and non-CVD (HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.15–0.46]) mortality compared with inactive stroke survivors. Sitting at least 8 h/d was associated with higher risks of all-cause (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.13–1.99]) and non-CVD (HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.18–2.20]) mortality compared with sitting <6 h/d. In the joint analyses, stroke survivors who were inactive or insufficiently active and sat for at least 8 h/d had the highest risks of all-cause (HR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.07–6.73]), CVD (HR, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.33–8.29]), and non-CVD (HR, 3.91 [95% CI, 1.70–8.95]) mortality when compared with those who were active and sat for <6 h/d. When stratifying by leisure-time physical activity, daily sitting time was not associated with mortality among active stroke survivors. These observations were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights the potential benefits of enhancing leisure-time physical activity and reducing sitting time to lower mortality rates among stroke survivors.

Graphical Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability globally, resulting in 7.3 million stroke-related deaths and 160.5 million disability-adjusted life-years.1,2 By 2030, the prevalence of stroke among US adults will increase by 20.5% compared with 2012, with an additional 3.4 million adults suffering from stroke.2 Stroke severely impairs daily functioning, and ≈75% of stroke survivors experience permanent disabilities.2–4
Sedentary behavior refers to any waking behavior of low energy expenditure (≤1.5 metabolic equivalents of task) while in a sitting, lying, or reclining posture.5,6 Among stroke survivors, the levels of physical activity are critically low. It is estimated that 40% of stroke survivors participate in little or no leisure-time physical activity and spend prolonged time sitting.7,8 The accelerometer-measured time of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among stroke survivors is reported to range from 5 to 10 min/d.9,10 In addition, their daily step counts are less than half of those in the age-matched group.9,10 Sedentary behavior has become a crucial concern in the fields of clinical practice and policy-making, as evidence supports its detrimental effects on morbidity and mortality.5,6 The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association advocates for less sitting time and more regular physical activity after stroke, but quantitative guidelines are not available due to scarce evidence.11
Physical activity is one of the modifiable health behaviors recommended for the prevention and rehabilitation of stroke.12–15 Increasing physical activity can activate neuroprotective mechanisms, mitigate other cardiovascular risk factors, and enhance overall health in stroke survivors.14–16 Despite previous research highlighting the beneficial effect of overall physical activity in stroke survivors, most prior studies have not distinguished domain-specific physical activity, especially that performed during leisure time. There is much evidence supporting the role of leisure-time physical activity in the primary prevention of stroke,17,18 yet evidence regarding the effects of leisure-time physical activity after stroke is limited. Epidemiological studies have revealed that leisure-time physical activity can eliminate the detrimental effects of prolonged sitting not only in the general population but also in populations with cancer or diabetes.19–21 A large prospective cohort study involving the general population in Taiwan concluded that all-cause mortality associated with prolonged sitting was alleviated by an additional 15 to 30 minutes of daily leisure-time physical activity.19 Among 1535 US cancer survivors included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), those engaging in at least 150 minutes of leisure-time physical activity per week showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality associated with prolonged sitting.20 In the NHANES cohort of US adults with diabetes, the association between prolonged sitting and increased all-cause and heart disease mortality was only observed among those who were insufficiently active. In contrast, the association was not observed among those who were sufficiently active.21 Nevertheless, it is less clear whether these findings could apply to stroke survivors, as epidemiological evidence remains scarce on the joint associations of leisure-time physical activity and daily sitting time with survival after stroke. To bridge these knowledge gaps, the main aim of this study was to assess the independent and joint associations of daily sitting time and leisure-time physical activity with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among a US nationally representative sample of stroke survivors.

No comments:

Post a Comment