Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

The genetics of ischaemic stroke

Way out of my league, translation to my level please.Link
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02202.x/full
Only the abstract and future paragraphs are copied, you'll have to read the url to get totally confused.

Abstract.  Matarin M, Singleton A, Hardy J, Meschia J (Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Bethesda, MD, USA; UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA). The genetics of ischaemic stroke (Review). J Intern Med 2010; 267: 139–155.

In this review, we discuss the genetic factors in both the aetiology and treatment of ischaemic stroke. We discuss candidate gene association studies, family linkage studies and the more recent whole genome association studies and whole genome expression studies. We also briefly discuss genetic testing for stroke risk and genetic analysis of treatment complications.

The future.  The coming months and years will see GWA studies of stroke and related phenotypes performed in multiple population samples, integrating analysis of SNPs, haplotypes and CNVs. As the sample sizes become larger the data will become more reliable and genuine and reproducible risk variants will be discovered. A subsequent challenge will be to move from these associated SNPs to a deeper understanding of the biology of risk for stroke. Many of the discovered susceptibility polymorphisms fall in noncoding regions and they are probably only tagging the real functional variants [112]. In future it will be necessary to move from association signal to causal variant, and from causal variant to the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in generating phenotypic effects. There is a need for methodologies that allow both the interpretation of functional consequences of variants and the description of functionally important variants [113]. Linkage and association studies coupling expression with genetic variability data have started to reveal the genetics underlying part of this variation, including complex allele-specific interactions and its relatively high level of heritability [97, 113–116].

Integrating expression with genetic variability in human stroke targeting organs such as the brain and cerebral vessels could tell us about the causal variants of IS and how they lead to disease. Finally the next-generation whole-sequencing technologies will be able to explore genome that right now is inaccessible or unassayed, providing a better profile of genomic differences between cases and controls. Already commercialization of the meagre replicated findings is assuring, and whilst this is probably premature, it will undoubtedly continue to increase. Responsible use of the genetic data that comes from these risk analyses will pose a challenge both to the medical profession and to the public if we are to achieve the goal of well-organized personal medicine.


No comments:

Post a Comment