Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Dabigatran: 260 fatal bleeds since approval worldwide

Be careful out there, your doctor should be following this, so ask him/her.
http://www.theheart.org/article/1314809.do?utm_campaign=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_source=20111121_EN_Heartwire

A total of 260 people worldwide have had a fatal bleed while taking dabigatran (Pradaxa), according to an analysis of the worldwide postmarketing database conducted by the drug's manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim. In response, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued a statement saying that it believes the deaths need to be viewed in the context of dabigatran's rapid uptake and increased awareness of possible side effects [1].

Events occurred between March 2008 and October 31, 2011, a spokesperson confirmed for heartwire. Dabigatran was granted US marketing approval in October 2010 for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, but the drug has been available for longer and for different indications in other countries.

"During the same period of time, treatment exposure to Pradaxa worldwide was estimated at 410 000 patient-treatment-years, which translates into a rate of 63 events per 100 000 patient-treatment-years," spokesperson Kate O'Connor said in an email.

This is in line with expectations for bleeding events based on the pivotal RE-LY trial, she added, "and are in alignment with the US prescribing information, which clearly states the benefits and risks associated with Pradaxa. Overall, the positive benefit/risk ratio of Pradaxa in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation remains unchanged."

In RE-LY, rates of fatal bleeding were numerically lower with the higher dose tested in the trial—150 mg twice daily—at 0.23% per year (230 per 100 000 patient-years) compared with warfarin at 0.33% per year (330 per 100 000 patient-years). Life-threatening bleeds in RE-LY were more common, numerically, in the 150-mg group than in the 110-mg group tested in the trial; the lower dose was not approved by the FDA, although it is on other worldwide markets.

Bleeding events with dabigatran have prompted safety advisories in Japan and Australia and have led to labeling updates in Europe and the US focusing on the need for monitoring renal function, since renal impairment can increase bleeding risk.

In Europe, dabigatran was first authorized in March 2008 for primary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in adults following orthopedic surgery. In early November, the EMA, in conjunction with the manufacturer, agreed to strengthen packaging information and to send an update to physicians emphasizing the need for renal assessment. On November 18, the EMA followed this with a press release stating that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) is aware of the media interest in Pradaxa bleeding events, that it is closely monitoring the issue, and that the drug's current labeling "adequately manage[s] the risk of bleeding."

The release continues: "The number of reports of bleeding in patients treated with Pradaxa has to be seen in the context of the rapidly increasing use of Pradaxa worldwide as a result of approval of a new indication . . . in several regions of the world and also the increased awareness about the drug, a factor that is known to lead to higher-than-usual reporting of side effects."

According to O'Connor, "we frequently communicate with the FDA and regulatory agencies around the world to ensure they have the most up-to-date information regarding the safety profile of Pradaxa."

No comments:

Post a Comment