The Clinical Science of Neurologic Rehabilitation (Contemporary Neurology Series, 66)
Brain Matters: Stories of a Neurologist and His Patients
Recovery after Stroke
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/4/308.abstract?etoc
Abstract
Body weight–supported treadmill training
(BWSTT) and robotic-assisted step training (RAST) have not, so far, led
to better
outcomes than a comparable dose of progressive
over-ground training (OGT) for disabled persons with stroke, spinal cord
injury,
multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, or
cerebral palsy. The conceptual bases for these promising rehabilitation
interventions
had once seemed quite plausible, but the results of
well-designed, randomized clinical trials have been disappointing. The
authors reassess the underpinning concepts for
BWSTT and RAST, which were derived from mammalian studies of
treadmill-induced
hind-limb stepping associated with central pattern
generation after low thoracic spinal cord transection, as well as human
studies of the triple crown icons of task-oriented
locomotor training, massed practice, and activity-induced
neuroplasticity.
The authors retrospectively consider where theory
and practice may have fallen short in the pilot studies that aimed to
produce
thoroughbred interventions. Based on these
shortcomings, the authors move forward with recommendations for the
future development
of workhorse interventions for walking. In the
absence of evidence for physical therapists to employ these strategies,
however,
BWSTT and RAST should not be provided routinely to
disabled, vulnerable persons in place of OGT outside of a scientifically
conducted efficacy trial.
However I thought my time in RAST was worth it. It was one of the reasons I switched clinics.
No comments:
Post a Comment