Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Tracking Motor Improvement at the Subtask Level During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients

At least this may start moving us away from the insistence of task-specific training. 30 years from now.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/26/7/822.abstract?etoc

Abstract

Background. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation can provide intensive, repetitious training to improve upper-limb function after stroke. To be more effective, motor therapy ought to be progressive and continuously challenge the patient’s ability. Current robotic systems have limited customization capability and require a physiotherapist to assess progress and adapt therapy accordingly. Objective. The authors aimed to track motor improvement during robot-assistive training and test a tool to more automatically adjust training. Methods. A total of 18 participants with chronic stroke were trained using a multicomponent reaching task assisted by a shoulder–elbow robotic assist. The time course of motor gains was assessed for each subtask of the practiced exercise. A statistical algorithm was then tested on simulated data to validate its ability to track improvement and subsequently applied to the recorded data to determine its performance compared with a therapist. Results. Patients’ recovery of motor function exhibited a time course dependent on the particular component of the executed task, suggesting that differential training on a subtask level is needed to continuously challenge the neuromuscular system and boost recovery. The proposed algorithm was tested on simulated data and was proven to track overall patient’s progress during rehabilitation. Conclusions. Tuning of the training program at the subtask level may accelerate the process of motor relearning. The algorithm proposed to adjust task difficulty opens new possibilities to automatically customize robotic-assistive training.

No comments:

Post a Comment