http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2016.00021/full?
- 1Neuroelectrics Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 2INRIA (Sophia Antipolis), Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- 3University of Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- 4Department of Radiology, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- 5Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (IBEB), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- 6Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, USA
- 7Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty of Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia
- 8Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
- 9Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
- 10Starlab Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Introduction
Although spontaneous poststroke recovery occurs, between 15% and 30% of stroke survivors are left permanently disabled (1).
Poststroke rehabilitation helps relearn skills that are lost when part
of the brain is damaged. As an adjunct therapy, non-invasive brain
stimulation (NIBS) techniques, including repetitive transcranial
magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial current stimulation (tCS) –
particularly direct current stimulation (tDCS) – are promising
approaches to enhance the effects of standardized rehabilitation
treatments in selected poststroke patients. Like rTMS, tDCS can alter
cortical excitability in predictable ways. tDCS is characterized as
neuromodulatory rather than neurostimulatory, since the currents
delivered during tDCS are not sufficient to directly generate action
potentials. tDCS-induced excitability alterations depend on the
duration, current density, and direction of the current flow. Generally,
anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) enhances excitability, while cathodal tDCS
(c-tDCS) reduces it (2–4).
Whereas after-effects of single stimulation sessions are in the time
range of early-phase long-term potentiation and long-term depression (~1
h), repetitive stimulations with certain intervals can induce
late-phase effects lasting longer than 24 h after intervention (3–6).
tDCS is a well-tolerated technique, easily applied over cortical
targets leading to adaptive neural reorganization and the reduction in
maladaptive plasticity during behavioral treatment. Further, tDCS is
less expensive and likely to be better accepted by patients than rTMS (7, 8), making it potentially well poised for home therapy.
Currently, the need to target not an isolated
cortical region, but several functionally correlated cortical hubs
involved in larger scale intrinsic brain networks is becoming
increasingly recognized (9, 10).
Advances in neuroimaging technology, such as functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging,
electroencephalography (EEG), and functional near-infrared spectroscopy
(fNIRS), are allowing us to non-invasively visualize and quantify brain
network connectivity in humans with increasing accuracy. Recently, we
showed how the optimal electrode configuration of a multichannel tDCS
system can be determined by using neuroimaging data to specify a target
map on the cortical surface for excitatory or inhibitory stimulation (11).
Multichannel tDCS is a new approach highly capable of efficiently
targeting distributed brain networks to facilitate beneficial
neuroplasticity and functional connectivity leading to poststroke
recovery.
Portable neuroimaging solutions, such as EEG and
fNIRS, can objectively capture individual brain states poststroke, which
can be used to customize and adapt NIBS in real time to facilitate
training (12, 13). An EEG–fNIRS-based method (14)
was recently proposed for screening and monitoring of neurovascular
coupling functionality in combination with tDCS. In this system,
neuronal and hemodynamic responses were abstractly represented as
feedback for tDCS effects. Such innovative portable EEG–fNIRS
neuroimaging systems could be used to objectively guide and quantify the
progress of a tDCS treatment regime in conjunction with
neurorehabilitation. Moreover, system identification and parameter
estimation techniques using neuronal and hemodynamic responses to tDCS
can be used to track the effects, e.g., on corticospinal excitability,
for closed-loop control of tDCS. Poststroke integrity of task-specific
ipsilesional and/or contralesional neural pathways can be determined
with EEG–fNIRS neuroimaging during task performance, which can be
leveraged toward the optimization of subject-specific tDCS. The goal may
be to correlate functional outcome with regard to EEG–fNIRS brain
activation patterns as a marker of the underlying task-specific residual
activation such that those residual brain activation patterns are
facilitated with individualized brain state-dependent multichannel tDCS
as an adjunct treatment during stroke rehabilitation.
Here, we introduce the potential of these two methods (11, 14)
to optimize future multichannel tDCS systems for modulation of
excitability of brain networks, represented by spatially extended
cortical targets. Combining both models closely addresses the individual
determinants of patterns of neuroplastic changes both to guide tDCS
treatment and to assess functional recovery. We present potential novel
application opportunities based on guided multichannel tDCS in
poststroke rehabilitation. Likewise, we show how multimodal approaches
pairing neuroimaging and electrophysiological measures with therapeutic
tDCS can extend its potential in aiding customized and personalized
long-term rehabilitation strategies, including post-acute rehabilitation
after stroke.
More at link.
More at link.
No comments:
Post a Comment