http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2015.00248/full?
- 1Neurorehabilitation and Recovery, Stroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 2Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Introduction
Limb proprioception refers to knowledge of the
spatial location of one’s limb in the absence of vision. Proprioception
is vital for motor control (1), particularly of the upper limbs (2).
It is essential for the control of coordinated movements, especially
small or precise movements, and for motor skill acquisition (3). Hence, proprioceptive deficits in the upper limbs are associated with decreased function (1).
Despite the importance of proprioception for function, it remains
unclear which brain regions beyond the primary sensorimotor cortices
(SIMIs) are involved in the processing of proprioception and how this
brain activation is altered following focal brain lesions associated
with proprioceptive deficits.
Researchers studying brain activation during passive movements of the elbow (4, 5), wrist (6, 7), hand (8), and finger (9, 10)
have identified activation in the contralateral primary somatosensory
(SI) and motor (MI) cortices and the inferior parietal lobe (IPL).
However, investigators disagreed on the pattern (contralateral,
ipsilateral, or both) and exact location of activation [supramarginal
gyrus (SMG) or the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII)]. In contrast,
neurophysiological studies of primates, identified the superior parietal
lobe as a key region for the processing of proprioception (11, 12).
The ability of current brain imaging paradigms to investigate
proprioceptive specific processing, and in particular the contribution
from higher order brain regions, requires careful consideration and
design.
Inconsistent proprioception-related brain activation
has also been reported in high-order motor cortices including the
supplementary motor area (SMA), cerebellum (6, 8), and the premotor cortex (PMC) (5, 6, 8).
Variations in proprioception-related brain activation may have been due
to the fact that brain imaging studies of passive movements varied in
paradigm design. In some cases, the support of the moving limb was
suboptimal and may have introduced significant tactile stimulation (6, 8, 10), thus generating confounding brain activation.
Proprioception-related brain activation has also been
studied using illusory vibrations. This is vibration of a tendon at a
frequency between 70 and 100Hz, which creates an illusion of movement (13).
Early findings from illusory vibration studies emphasized activation in
motor cortices including: MI, SMA, PMC, and the cingulate motor area (14, 15). Later, researchers also identified brain activation in the IPL (5, 16–18).
However, as was the case with passive movements, reported activation
varied in location, with reports of activation in the parietal operculum
(5, 15, 17) or the SMG (16, 18). Hemispheric bias was also controversial with some researchers reporting bilateral activation (16, 18), while others report a right hemisphere dominance (15, 17).
Illusory vibrations provide different peripheral
stimuli to passive movements. The stimulus is large phasic and of
uniform frequency in the primary afferent fibers of the muscle spindles (19, 20). Minimal, if any, stimulation is produced in the secondary fibers of the muscle spindles and the joint receptors (19, 20).
In contrast, passive movements produce multifrequency phasic and tonic
stimulation of the primary afferent fibers in the muscle spindles (21). Secondary fibers of the muscle spindles and joint receptors are also stimulated (21–23). It is possible that different peripheral stimuli were associated with differential brain activation (5).
In such circumstances, brain activation during passive movements is
likely to reflect the central processing of proprioception more
accurately than illusory vibration.
An important limitation of both passive movement and
illusory vibration brain imaging studies of proprioception is that
participants were not required to provide accurate and measurable
responses to the proprioceptive stimuli during scanning. Responses to
proprioceptive stimuli are important for two reasons. First, by asking
participants for accurate responses to proprioceptive stimuli (and
monitoring the responses), examiners ensure that participants adequately
engage in proprioceptive information processing. Second, the response
requirement introduces a certain degree of difficulty to the
proprioceptive task, which would not have been present if responses were
not required. Increased task difficulty is desirable due to the
associated increase in cortical activation (24, 25).
In healthy participants, findings from behavioral
studies have suggested asymmetry in the accuracy of proprioception from
the right and left limbs (26–28).
Asymmetry in behavioral measures suggests hemispheric dominance and
thus asymmetry in proprioception-related brain activation. Brain
activation studies of illusory vibration stimulation confirmed right
hemispheric dominance (15, 17, 18).
Brain activation in the IPL and inferior frontal gyrus was found in all
three studies, but the exact loci of activation and degree of
laterality (i.e., right hemispheric or bilateral activation) varied.
None of the brain imaging studies of passive movements investigated
laterality of proprioception.
Quantitative behavioral measures of proprioception in
stroke-affected individuals have shown deficits in about 50% of the
participants (1, 29). Considering the adverse effect of proprioceptive deficits on function (1),
it is important not only to understand the central processing of
proprioception in healthy participants but also how it changes following
brain lesions associated with proprioceptive deficits. This is because
proprioception can be rehabilitated (30–32) with associated changes in brain activation (33) and improvement in function (34).
The current study was designed to investigate the brain–behavior relationship of proprioception. The research questions were:
(1) Which high-order brain areas are important for early coding of natural proprioceptive stimuli?
(2) Is proprioception-related brain activation lateralized, and if so in which areas?
(3)
How does proprioception-related brain activation in stroke-affected
individuals with proprioceptive deficits differ from that of healthy
participants?
To answer these questions, we designed an
event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study with a
controlled proprioceptive stimulus and response paradigm. The study was
exploratory with data-driven laterality analyses.
First, proprioceptive stimuli were delivered with
maximal limb support and minimal tactile stimulation to eliminate
confounding brain activation. Second, participants were required to
respond accurately to each proprioceptive stimulus for optimal brain
activation related to attended proprioceptive information processing.
Third, the paradigm and analyses were designed to show brain activation
at the beginning of a proprioception task during the coding of
proprioceptive stimuli. We hypothesized that coding proprioception would
involve high-order somatosensory cortices in the parietal lobe
including the IPL, the SII, and the superior parietal lobe. We also
hypothesized that proprioception-related brain activation would be found
in high-order motor cortices in the frontal lobe including the PMC,
SMA, and cingulate motor cortex. The second hypothesis was that
proprioception-related brain activation would be lateralized to the
right hemisphere, particularly the high-order cortices. Finally, we
hypothesized that laterality would decrease following stroke which
affected proprioception.
More at link.
More at link.
No comments:
Post a Comment