How many fucking times does action observation need to be proven in
research before someone writes up a fucking stroke protocol on it? NEVER I BET.
With 80 action observation posts back to May, 2011 it just shows the fucking incompetence in stroke.
Ask your doctor what stroke research partner they are working with to
determine the best interventions for stroke rehab. Your doctor can't be
that lazy sit on your asses person, waiting for SOMEONE ELSE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. The solutions are out there we just need them translated into protocols.
Effects of action observation therapy on hand dexterity and EEG-based cortical activation patterns in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation , Volume 23(5) , Pgs. 318-325.
NARIC Accession Number: J77365. What's this?
ISSN: 1074-9357.
Author(s): Kuk, Eun-Ju; Kim, Jong-Man; Oh, Duck-Won; Hwang, Han-Jeong.
Publication Year: 2016.
Number of Pages: 8.
Abstract: Study examined the effects of action observation training (AOT) on hand dexterity and electroencephalography (EEG)-based cortical activation in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. AOT is a training process that involves observing specific actions performed by others, and subsequently imitating these actions prior to physical training, with the benefits of repetitively practicing the observed actions. Twenty patients with post-stroke hemiparesis were randomly divided into either the experimental group (EG) or control group (CG), with 10 patients in each group. Prior to the execution of motor tasks (carrying wooden blocks from one box to another), subjects in the EG and CG observed a video clip displaying the execution of the same motor task and pictures showing landscapes, respectively. Outcome measures included the Box and Block Test (BBT) to evaluate hand dexterity and EEG-based brain mapping to detect changes in cortical activation. The BBT scores (EG: 20.50 at pre-test and 24.40 at post-test; CG: 20.20 at pre-test and 20.60 at post-test) revealed significant main effects for the time and group and significant time-by-group interactions. For the subjects in the EG, topographical representations obtained with the EEG-based brain mapping system were different in each session of the AOT and remarkable changes occurred from the second session of AOT. Furthermore, the middle frontal gyrus was less active at post-test than at pre-test. These findings suggest that AOT may be beneficial in altering cortical activation patterns and hand dexterity.
Descriptor Terms: BRAIN, DEXTERITY, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, HEMIPLEGIA, MOTOR SKILLS, PHYSICAL THERAPY, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Kuk, Eun-Ju, Kim, Jong-Man, Oh, Duck-Won, Hwang, Han-Jeong. (2016). Effects of action observation therapy on hand dexterity and EEG-based cortical activation patterns in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation , 23(5), Pgs. 318-325. Retrieved 1/14/2018, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment