Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Cerebellar TMS May Improve Gait, Balance in Post-Stroke Hemiparesis

 You mean to tell me that all these earlier posts were not good enough to write up a stroke protocol? And you still use the word 'may' instead of will. Damn it all we want EXACT PROTOCOLS WITH EFFICACY RATINGS.

  • ETMS (1 post, Dec. 2015)
  • rTMS (38 posts, to Jan. 2013)
  • TMS (42 posts, to Dec. 2011)

 

Cerebellar TMS May Improve Gait, Balance in Post-Stroke Hemiparesis


"Very exciting" results with magnetic stimulation in small trial

  • by Contributing Writer, MedPage Today
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum led to improved post-stroke motor functions in a phase IIa randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial in Italy, researchers said.
After 3 weeks of repetitive, intermittent theta-burst magnetic stimulation to the cerebellum (CRB-iTBS) and physical therapy, hemiparetic patients following ischemic stroke improved their ability to walk and keep their balance more than patients who received sham stimulation and physical therapy, reported Giacomo Koch, MD, PhD, of the Santa Lucia Foundation in Rome, and colleagues in JAMA Neurology.
"For the first time, we modulated the neural activity of the cerebellum in the context of a clinical trial in patients suffering from large stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery," Koch told MedPage Today. "We found that cerebellar stimulation was able to improve the outcome when coupled with rehabilitation by changing the activity of neural networks connecting the cerebellum with the parietal cortex."
Studies using non-invasive brain stimulation methods for post-stroke rehabilitation have had mixed results to date, Koch said. "But these studies mainly tried to modulate the activity of the primary motor cortex," he pointed out. "Our study shows that targeting alternative networks connected with motor cortex may be a more successful strategy."
The novelty here is targeting the cerebellum, noted Pablo Celnik, MD, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, who was not involved in the study.
"These results are very exciting because they suggest that stimulation of the cerebellum can be paired with physical therapy to augment the effects of rehabilitation," Celnik told MedPage Today. "This is especially so for chronic stroke patients, whose condition is more difficult to improve."
In the trial, Koch and colleagues studied hemiparetic patients from 2013 to 2017 who had ischemic chronic stroke (at least 6 months before the study) in the territory of the contralateral middle cerebral artery. They randomly assigned patients to treatment with CRB-iTBS or sham iTBS applied over the cerebellar hemisphere, ipsilateral to the affected body side, immediately before physiotherapy daily for 3 weeks.
A total of 34 patients (mean age 64; 38.2% female) completed the study. Patients in the two groups did not differ at baseline in age, sex, lesion side, number of months from the stroke event, and stroke severity on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The procedure was well tolerated and neither group reported significant adverse effects.
After 3 weeks, patients who received CRB-iTBS showed an improvement in gait and balance functions, while patients who received sham stimulation did not. For CRB-iTBS patients, the mean Berg Balance Scale score -- the primary outcome for the study -- was 34.5 at baseline, 43.4 at 3 weeks after treatment, and 47.5 at 3 weeks after the end of treatment (P<0.001), passing from a level in which patients need assistance walking to a level of independent walking, according to the researchers.
Patients treated with CRB-iTBS, but not sham iTBS, also showed a reduction of step width in gait analysis (mean 16.8 cm at baseline compared with mean 14.3 cm 3 weeks after treatment, P<0.05) and an increase of neural activity over the posterior parietal cortex as measured by a combination of TMS and electroencephalogram.
The researchers found no overall treatment-associated differences in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery and Barthel Index of daily living scores. Overall, the procedure was well tolerated and neither group reported significant adverse effects.
"Theta-burst TMS represents the continuing evolution of neuromodulation techniques to deliver the strongest and most lasting treatment benefit," observed Leigh Charvet, PhD, of New York University School of Medicine, who was not involved in the study. "It is especially encouraging to see the improvement in gait and balance, and these findings may be generalizable to other conditions as well."
As with much work in this area, this study has a relatively small sample size, Charvet told MedPage Today. "Larger clinical trials are needed to understand how to optimize the benefit and minimize all safety risks, and also to understand the individual differences that may contribute to the therapeutic response," she said.
In addition to its small sample, the study also was limited because it included patients with stroke in both hemispheres so it could not account for laterality, Koch and colleagues noted. The relatively low number of recording electrodes also did not allow the researchers to perform brain source analyses, they added.
The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Koch and co-authors disclosed no relevant relationships with industry.

No comments:

Post a Comment