Ok, you described something about stroke. What can be done about it that will get survivors 100% recovered?
A Natural History Study of Acute Ischemic Strokes
Originally published9 Aug 2018Stroke. 2018;49:2102–2107
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
Although
perfusion abnormality is an increasingly important therapeutic target,
the natural history of tissue at risk without reperfusion treatment is
understudied.(So we still know nothing about the neuronal cascade of death?)
Our objective was to determine how time affects penumbral
salvage and infarct growth in untreated acute ischemic stroke patients
and whether collateral status affects this relationship.
Methods—
We
used a prospectively collected, multicenter acute stroke registry to
assess acute stroke patients who were not treated with intravenous
thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. We analyzed baseline computed
tomography angiogram and computed tomography perfusion within 24 hours
of stroke onset along with follow-up imaging and assessed time from
stroke onset to baseline imaging, ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early
CT Score), vessel occlusion, collaterals, ischemic core, and penumbra.
Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were calculated. Correlations
between time and penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated
with Spearman correlation. Penumbral salvage and infarct growth were
compared between subjects with good versus poor collateral status using
the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Clinical and imaging factors affecting
penumbral salvage and infarct growth were evaluated by linear
regression.
Results—
Among
94 untreated stroke patients eligible for this analysis, the mean age
was 65 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score
was 13, and median (range) time from stroke onset to baseline imaging
was 2.9 (0.4–23) hours. There was no correlation between time and
salvaged penumbra (
r=0.06;
P=0.56) or infarct growth (
r=−0.05;
P=0.61).
Infarct growth was higher among those with poor collaterals versus
those with good collaterals (median, 52.3 versus 0.9 cm
3;
P<0.01).
Penumbral salvage was lower among those with poor collaterals compared
with those with good collaterals (poor, 0 [0–0]; good, 5.9 cm
3 [0–29.4];
P<0.01).
Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that collaterals, but not
time, were significantly associated with infarct growth and penumbral
salvage.
Conclusions—
In
this natural history study, penumbral salvage and infarct growth were
less time dependent and more a measure of collateral flow.
No comments:
Post a Comment