Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, March 16, 2020

Social Robot for Rehabilitation: Expert Clinicians and Post-Stroke Patients' Evaluation Following a Long-Term Intervention

Did your hospital evaluate and get this socially assistive robot from August 2018? Or did they incompetently not even know about it? 

Robots as tools and partners in rehabilitation August 2018

The latest here for your hospital to ignore. 

Social Robot for Rehabilitation: Expert Clinicians and Post-Stroke Patients' Evaluation Following a Long-Term Intervention

ABSTRACT

We developed a novel gamified system for post-stroke long-term rehabilitation, using the humanoid robot Pepper (SoftBank, Aldebaran). Here, we present a participatory-design study with insights from both expert clinicians and from stroke patients who underwent a long-term intervention with the robot. We first present the results of a qualitative study with expert clinicians (n=12) on the compatibility of this system with the needs of post-stroke patients, and then the preliminary results of a long-term intervention study with post-stroke participants (n=4) in a rehabilitation facility. Both the clinicians and the patients found the robot and the gamified system engaging, motivating and meeting the needs of upper limb rehabilitation. The clinicians gave specific recommendations that may be applicable to a wide range of technologies for post-stroke rehabilitation.

References

  1. Sandy McCombe Waller et al. 2016. Impaired motor preparation and execution during standing reach in people with chronic stroke, Neurosci. Lett. 630, (Sep. 2016), 38--44. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2016.07.010Google ScholarCross Ref
  2. Saif S. Rathore, Albert R. Hinn, Lawton S. Cooper, Herman A. Tyroler, and Wayne D. Rosamond. 2002. Characterization of incident stroke signs and symptoms findings from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study, Stroke 33, (Nov 2002), 2718--2721. DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000035286.87503.31Google ScholarCross Ref
  3. Melanie C. Banina, Aditi A. Mullick, Bradford J. McFadyen, and Mindy F. Levin. 2017. Upper limb obstacle - avoidance behavior in individuals with stroke, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 31, 2, (Feb. 2017), 133--146. DOI:10.1177/154596816662527Google Scholar

No comments:

Post a Comment