Evaluation of a staff behaviour change intervention to increase the use of ward-based practice books and active practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a phase-1 pre–post observational study

Useless for two reasons;

1. I bet these are guidelines in the books, NOT PROTOCOLS.

2. You need to be measuring survivor recovery, survivors don't give a shit about staff changes unless they lead to recovery. MEASURE WHAT IS IMPORTANT. 

Evaluation of a staff behaviour change intervention to increase the use of ward-based practice books and active practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a phase-1 pre–post observational study

Show all authors

Claire Stewart, Emma Power, Annie McCluskey, ...

First Published March 23, 2020 Research Article

https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520911420

Article information

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate a staff behaviour change intervention to increase the use of ward-based practice books and active practice by stroke inpatients.

Design:

This is a pre–post observational study.

Setting:

This study was conducted in a inpatient rehabilitation unit in Australia.

Subjects:

Stroke inpatients participated in the study.

Intervention:

A staff behaviour change intervention was designed to support staff to implement practice books. The intervention included staff training on motivation and coaching, and weekly audit and feedback for six months. The environment was restructured to bring staff together weekly at the bedside to review audit data and share skills.

Main measures:

Medical record audit and behavioural mapping were used to compare the number of stroke participants with/using a practice book pre- and post-intervention. Pre- and post-intervention, the percentage of observations where a stroke participant was actively practising, repetitions of practice recorded and type of supervision were compared.

Results:

A total of 24 participants were observed (n = 12 pre, n = 12 post). Post-intervention, the number of participants with practice books increased from one to six (OR = 11, 95% CI = (0.9, 550.7)), but this change was not statistically significant (P = 0.069). Five participants recorded repetitions in their practice books post-intervention, three were observed using practice books. There was no change in median repetitions recorded (r_pbs = 0.00, 95% CI = (−0.4, 0.4), P = 1.000) or observed active practice (r_pbs = –0.02, 95% CI = (−0.4, 0.4), P = 0.933). Active practice was often fully supervised by a therapist.

Conclusion:

A staff behaviour change intervention has the potential to increase the number of stroke survivors receiving ward-based practice books but did not increase active practice. (Precisely because these were not protocols with EXACT INSTRUCTIONS AND NUMBER OF REPETITIONS TO ACCOMPLISH RESULTS. The whole point of stroke research is 100% recovery. This got us nowhere closer to that.)