Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians

Did this come to fruition in the last 4 years? Ask your doctor. 

The three laws of robotics are: per Asimov
(1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 

(2) A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 

(3) A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
 

 Three laws of neurorobotics;
According to the aforementioned desirable features of a neurorobot, we have re-formulated the three laws of robotics into three laws for robotics in neurorehabilitation:
(1) A robot for neurorehabilitation may not injure a patient or allow a patient to come to harm. 

(2) A robot must obey the orders given it by therapists(Why therapists, why not the patient?), except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 

(3) A robot must adapt its behavior to patients’ abilities in a transparent manner as long as this does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
 

 

The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians

 Marco Iosa
1

Giovanni Morone
1

Andrea Cherubini
2

Stefano Paolucci
1
Received: 1 September 2015/Accepted: 11 December 2015

 The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Abstract

 Most studies and reviews on robots for neurorehabilitation focus on their effectiveness. These studies often report inconsistent results. This and many other reasons limit the credit given to these robots by therapists and patients. Further, neurorehabilitation is often still based on therapists’ expertise, with competition among different schools of thought, generating substantial uncertainty about what exactly a neurorehabilitation robot should do. Little attention has been given to ethics. This review adopts anew approach, inspired by Asimov’s three laws of robotics and based on the most recent studies in neurorobotics, for proposing new guidelines for designing and using robots for neurorehabilitation. We propose three laws of neurorobotics based on the ethical need for safe and effective robots, the redefinition of their role as therapist helpers, and the need for clear and transparent human–machine inter-faces. These laws may allow engineers and clinicians to work closely together on a new generation of neurorobots.

No comments:

Post a Comment