I got nothing out of this, Motor Evoked Potentials mean squat to survivors. Useless. But those wonderful abbreviations, hope you can translate research jargon. I couldn't. Did it work? Because if virtual reality works then lots of patients could use it. Even me with lots of dead brain.
The association between reorganization of bilateral M1 topography and function in response to early intensive hand focused upper limb rehabilitation following stroke is dependent on ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity
Frontiers in Neurology , Volume 10(258)NARIC Accession Number: J83228. What's this?
ISSN: 1664-2295.
Author(s): Yarossi, Mathew ; Patel, Jigna ; Qiu, Qinyin ; Massood, Supriya ; Fluet, Gerard ; Merians, Alma ; Adamovich, Sergei Tunik, Eugene.
Project Number: 90RE5021.
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 13.
Abstract: Study examined the relationship between changes in function/motor recovery and cortical motor topography in patients undergoing early (<3 months) and intensive hand focused upper-limb rehabilitation. Seventeen individuals received 8 one hour-sessions of training with virtual reality/robotic simulations. Participants were divided into two groups (MEP+, MEP-) based on whether motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were present in the affected first dorsal interosseous (FDI) at any time point. Clinical tests were performed prior to (PRE), directly following (POST), and 1 month following (1M) training. Measures included the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFMA); kinematic and kinetic assessments including finger active range of motion (finger AROM) and maximum pinch force (MPF); and bilateral TMS mapping of 5 hand muscles. MEP+ individuals improved significantly more than MEP- individuals from PRE to 1M on the WMFT, BBT, and finger AROM scores. Ipsilesional hemisphere FDI area increased significantly with time in the MEP+ group. FDI area of the contralesional hemisphere was not significantly different across time points or groups. In the MEP+ group, significant correlations were observed between PRE and 1M changes in ipsilesional FDI area and WMFT, BBT, and finger AROM, and contralesional FDI area and UEFMA and MPF. In the MEP- group, no significant correlations were found between changes in contralesional FDI area and functional outcomes.
Descriptor Terms: BIOENGINEERING, BODY MOVEMENT, BRAIN, COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, ELECTRICAL STIMULATION, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, EXERCISE, IMAGING, LIMBS, MOTOR SKILLS, REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY, ROBOTICS, STROKE, THERAPEUTIC TRAINING.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.00258/full.
Citation: Yarossi, Mathew , Patel, Jigna , Qiu, Qinyin , Massood, Supriya , Fluet, Gerard , Merians, Alma , Adamovich, Sergei Tunik, Eugene. (2019). The association between reorganization of bilateral M1 topography and function in response to early intensive hand focused upper limb rehabilitation following stroke is dependent on ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity. Frontiers in Neurology , 10(258) Retrieved 4/17/2020, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment