Oh God, prediction crapola once again. When are our stroke leaders going to read the riot act to them to work on the only goal in stroke, 100% recovery? Not this lazy crapola of prediction. Why not focus on what doctor interventions did to get to 100% recovery? Never mind, your doctor is doing nothing to stop the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. Resulting in extra millions of neurons dying. Ask your doctor for a count of how many neurons died due to their inaction. $1000 a dead neuron sounds about right for billing your doctor.
Regression techniques employing feature selection to predict clinical outcomes in stroke
PLoS One , Volume 13(10) , Pgs. e0205639.NARIC Accession Number: J83221. What's this?
ISSN: 1932-6203.
Author(s): Abdel Majeed, Yazan; Awadalla, Saria S. ; Patton, James L..
Project Number: 90RE5010 (formerly H133E120010).
Publication Year: 2018.
Number of Pages: 17.
Abstract: Study investigated the impact of patient demographic characteristics, movement features, and a three-week upper-extremity intervention on the post-treatment change in the Upper Extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The study trained 26 chronic stroke survivors for a two-week period (six 1-hour training sessions) and extracted variables pertaining to three domains: patient movement, clinical state and demographics. Prediction models were used to identify the set of salient demographic and movement features related to change in the UEFM and WMFT. Of the regression models tested, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models performed best. In models based on LASSO, validation tests accounted for 65 and 86 percent of the variability in the UEFM and the WMFT, respectively. The results showed that age, affected limb, and several measures describing the patient's ability to efficiently direct motions with a single burst of speed were the most consequential in predicting clinical recovery. On the other hand, the upper-extremity intervention was not a significant predictor of recovery. Beyond a simple prognostic tool, these results suggest that focusing therapy on the more-important features is likely to improve recovery. Such validation-intensive methods are a novel approach to determining the relative importance of patient-specific metrics and may help guide the design of customized therapy.
Descriptor Terms: BODY MOVEMENT, CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS, DEMOGRAPHICS, INTERVENTION, LIMBS, MEASUREMENTS, MOTOR SKILLS, OUTCOMES, PREDICTION, QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205639.
Citation: Abdel Majeed, Yazan, Awadalla, Saria S. , Patton, James L.. (2018). Regression techniques employing feature selection to predict clinical outcomes in stroke. PLoS One , 13(10), Pgs. e0205639. Retrieved 4/17/2020, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment