I couldn't understand a thing here, so useless for survivors.
Improved walking function in laboratory does not guarantee increased community walking in stroke survivors: Potential role of gait biomechanics
Journal of Biomechanics , Volume 91 , Pgs. 151-159.
NARIC Accession Number: J84187. What's this?
ISSN: 0021-9290.
Author(s): Ardestani, Marzieh M. ; Henderson, Christopher E. ; Hornby, T. George.
Project Number: H133B031127, 90RT5027 (formerly H133B140012).
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 9.
NARIC Accession Number: J84187. What's this?
ISSN: 0021-9290.
Author(s): Ardestani, Marzieh M. ; Henderson, Christopher E. ; Hornby, T. George.
Project Number: H133B031127, 90RT5027 (formerly H133B140012).
Publication Year: 2019.
Number of Pages: 9.
Abstract:
Study investigated the relationships between clinical and biomechanical
walking measures that may contribute to changes in daily stepping
activity following physical interventions provided to participants with
subacute stroke. The primary outcomes were short- and long-term changes
in daily stepping activity, evaluated following up to 40 training
sessions (POST) and at 2 to 6 months follow-up (F/U). Thirty-nine
participants were categorized into three groups: (1)
responders/retainers who increased daily stepping >500 steps per day
at POST without decreases in stepping at F/U, (2)
responders/non-retainers who increased stepping at POST but declined
>500 steps per day at F/U, and (3) non-responders who did not change
daily stepping from baseline testing (BSL). Gait kinematics and kinetics
were evaluated during graded treadmill assessments at BSL and POST.
Clinical measures of gait speed, timed walking distance, balance, and
balance confidence were measured at BSL, POST and F/U. Between-group
comparisons and regression analyses were conducted to predict stepping
activity from BSL and POST measurements. Baseline and changes in
clinical measures of walking demonstrated selective associations with
stepping, although kinematic measures appeared to better discriminate
responders. Specific measures suggest greater paretic versus non-paretic
kinematic changes in responders with training, although greater
non-paretic changes predicted greater gains (i.e., smaller declines) in
stepping in retainers at F/U. No kinetic variables were primary
predictors of changes in stepping activity at POST or F/U. The combined
findings indicate that specific biomechanical assessments may help
differentiate changes in daily stepping activity post-stroke.
Descriptor Terms: AMBULATION, BIOENGINEERING, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PHYSICAL THERAPY, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Ardestani, Marzieh M. , Henderson, Christopher E. , Hornby, T. George. (2019). Improved walking function in laboratory does not guarantee increased community walking in stroke survivors: Potential role of gait biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanics , 91, Pgs. 151-159. Retrieved 8/18/2020, from REHABDATA database.
Descriptor Terms: AMBULATION, BIOENGINEERING, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PHYSICAL THERAPY, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Ardestani, Marzieh M. , Henderson, Christopher E. , Hornby, T. George. (2019). Improved walking function in laboratory does not guarantee increased community walking in stroke survivors: Potential role of gait biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanics , 91, Pgs. 151-159. Retrieved 8/18/2020, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment