Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Lupus Anticoagulant Tied to COVID Thrombosis

 Do we need to wait for this testing to occur or do we just immediately start anticoagulation therapies? I'm not waiting around, I'm having my doctor give me heparin immediately.

Lupus Anticoagulant Tied to COVID Thrombosis

Small study suggests consideration of therapeutic anticoagulation

A blue gloved hand holds a test tube labeled: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) - Test

Prothrombotic autoantibodies were elevated in COVID-19 and linked to development of thrombosis, a small observational study showed.

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) appeared in 44% of COVID-19 patients tested versus 22% of other patients (30 of 68 vs 27 of 119, P=0.002), according to Morayma Reyes Gil, MD, PhD, of Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, and colleagues.

In the COVID-19 group, 63% of the LA-positive patients had documented arterial or venous thrombosis compared with 34% of the LA-negative patients (P=0.03), the group reported in JAMA Network Open.

C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were higher with LA positivity but not linked with thrombosis. On the other hand, LA remained a significant independent predictor of thrombosis after adjusting for CRP, with an odds ratio of 4.39.

"LA-positive individuals have a marked risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, and therapeutic anticoagulation should be considered in these patients," the group concluded.

Prior series of COVID-19 patients have also found high LA-positive prevalence. For example, an observational study that is often referenced in support of inpatient anticoagulation for COVID-19, based on a suggestion of mortality benefit, found 91% LA positive among the 34 patients tested for it, significantly more than seen in historical controls.

LA has also been associated with thrombotic events in systemic lupus erythematosus, but the autoantibodies are not specific to lupus.

Gil and colleagues' retrospective study included 187 patients with LA testing ordered from March 1 to April 30, 2020, at Montefiore Medical Center. The comparator group for the COVID-19 patients was the 119 who were not tested, or were negative by PCR testing, for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Mean prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were more prolonged in LA-positive compared with LA-negative patients, the researchers noted.

LA positivity was determined by the dilute Russell viper venom time, because PTT-based tests are interfered with by the elevated CRP levels seen in most patients with COVID-19.

LA status didn't correlate with gender, race, ethnicity, ventilation, mortality, or anticoagulation at the time of thrombosis.

Study limitations included a small sample size and inability to control time of LA testing from admission to outcome (mortality and thrombosis).

Disclosures

Gil and co-authors disclosed no relevant relationships with industry.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment