This is so fucking simple, create protocols, you even imply that in your conclusion. Where is your research that will do exactly that? Maybe something in these 9? The first thing needed is an OBJECTIVE DAMAGE DIAGNOSIS. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) is not objective.
Early Mobilization (9 posts)
Early Mobilization After Stroke: Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Support Clinicians' Decision-Making?
Venesha Rethnam
Kathryn S. Hayward
Julie Bernhardt
Leonid Churilov- 1Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- 2National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 3Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- 4Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- 5Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Importance: Early mobilization, out-of-bed activity, is a component of acute stroke unit care; however, stroke patient heterogeneity requires complex decision-making. Clinically credible and applicable CPGs are needed to support and optimize the delivery of care. In this study, we are specifically exploring the role of clinical practice guidelines to support individual patient-level decision-making by stroke clinicians about early mobilization post-stroke.
Methods: Our study uses a novel, two-pronged approach. (1) A review of CPGs containing recommendations for early mobilization practices published after 2015 was appraised using purposely selected items from the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) tool relevant to decision-making for clinicians. (2) A cross-sectional study involving semi-structured interviews with Australian expert stroke clinicians representing content experts and CPG target users. Every CPG was independently assessed against the AGREE-REX standard by two reviewers. Expert stroke clinicians, invited via email, were recruited between June 2019 to March 2020.The main outcomes from the review was the proportion of criteria addressed for each AGREE-REX item by individual and all CPG(s). The main cross-sectional outcomes were the distributions of stroke clinicians' responses about the utility of CPGs, specific areas of uncertainty in early mobilization decision-making, and suggested parameters for inclusion in future early mobilization CPGs.
Results: In 18 identified CPGs, many did not adequately address the “Evidence” and “Applicability to Patients” AGREE-REX items. Out of 30 expert stroke clinicians (11 physicians [37%], 11 physiotherapists [37%], 8 nurses [26%]; median [IQR] years of experience, 14 [10–25]), 47% found current CPGs “too broad or vague,” while 40% rely on individual clinical judgement and interpretation of the evidence to select an evidence-based choice of action. The areas of uncertainty in decision-making revealed four key suggestions: (1) more granular descriptions of patient and stroke characteristics for appropriate tailoring of decisions, (2) clear statements about when clinical flexibility is appropriate, (3) detailed description of the intervention dose, and (4) physical assessment criteria including safety parameters.
Conclusions: The lack of specificity, clinical applicability, and adaptability of current CPGs to effectively respond to the heterogeneous clinical stroke context has provided a clear direction for improvement.
No comments:
Post a Comment