Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Differential Inhibition by Riluzole, Lamotrigine, and Phenytoin of Sodium and Calcium Currents in Cortical Neurons: Implications for Neuroprotective Strategies

So where are the therapy protocols for this? Its only been known since 1997.

Complete failure on our stroke associations part. How can they look survivors in the eye? Somebody needs to be fired.

Rodent research was done in 1990.

Differential Inhibition by Riluzole, Lamotrigine, and Phenytoin of Sodium and Calcium Currents in Cortical Neurons: Implications for Neuroprotective Strategies

Abstract

Among the several classes of drugs currently studied as neuroprotective agents, glutamate release blockers have been indicated as being rather effective. In particular, lamotrigine and riluzole have shown promise in the treatment of either acutely developing cellular damages (stroke, posttraumatic lesions) or slowly progressing neurodegenerative diseases as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These drugs are supposed to interfere with the release of endogenous glutamatein situ,yet the mechanisms underlying this effect are not fully defined. One possibility is that lamotrigine and riluzole act by inhibiting voltage-dependent inward conductances active in the soma and/or in the axon terminal region. Therefore, we have investigated the effects of lamotrigine and riluzole on the voltage-gated sodium and calcium currents of acutely isolated neurons from the adult rat neocortex. In addition, since phenytoin is a well-known blocker of the sodium channel, we have compared lamotrigine and riluzole responses with the peak current inhibition produced by phenytoin in the same cells. Lamotrigine produced a large reduction of the high-voltage-activated calcium currents and a smaller, use-dependent inhibition of the sodium conductance. Riluzole inhibited significantly the sodium current at surprisingly low concentrations (nanomolar range) and by up to 80% at saturating doses (1–10 μM). Furthermore, riluzole inhibited both high- and low-voltage-activated calcium currents in neocortical neurons isolated from adult and young animals. By contrast, phenytoin caused only a slight reduction of high-voltage-activated calcium currents even at supratherapeutic doses (by &lt12% at 10 μM). Taken together, the different pharmacological profiles of the tested agents might indicate that glutamate release blockers do not represent a homogenous class of drugs. Conversely, our findings could support their selective utilization in different disease status.

No comments:

Post a Comment