Maybe your doctor can reuse this and create a stroke protocol out of this for your cognitive training. Not to be done on your own, that would be dangerous for your doctor when you realize the incompetency of the stroke world out there.
Computer-Based Cognitive Training for Executive Functions after Stroke: A Systematic Review
- 1Department of Psychology, Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 2Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 3Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Background: Stroke commonly results in
cognitive impairments in working memory, attention, and executive
function, which may be restored with appropriate training programs. Our
aim was to systematically review the evidence for computer-based
cognitive training of executive dysfunctions.
Methods: Studies were included if they
concerned adults who had suffered stroke or other types of acquired
brain injury, if the intervention was computer training of executive
functions, and if the outcome was related to executive functioning. We
searched in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library.
Study quality was evaluated based on the CONSORT Statement. Treatment
effect was evaluated based on differences compared to pre-treatment
and/or to a control group.
Results: Twenty studies were included.
Two were randomized controlled trials that used an active control group.
The other studies included multiple baselines, a passive control group,
or were uncontrolled. Improvements were observed in tasks similar to
the training (near transfer) and in tasks dissimilar to the training
(far transfer). However, these effects were not larger in trained than
in active control groups. Two studies evaluated neural effects and found
changes in both functional and structural connectivity. Most studies
suffered from methodological limitations (e.g., lack of an active
control group and no adjustment for multiple testing) hampering
differentiation of training effects from spontaneous recovery, retest
effects, and placebo effects.
Conclusions: The positive findings of
most studies, including neural changes, warrant continuation of research
in this field, but only if its methodological limitations are
addressed.
Introduction
Stroke, resulting from brain hemorrhage or infarction,
commonly results in cognitive impairments such as aphasia, neglect,
reduced processing speed, impaired attention, and executive dysfunction
(e.g., Cumming et al., 2013). Even though cognition can improve during the first year after stroke (Desmond et al., 1996; Tham et al., 2002; del Ser et al., 2005),
cognitive impairment frequently persists long after. More than 60% of
stroke survivors still reported mild to severe cognitive impairment up
to 10 years after stroke (Maaijwee et al., 2014; Middleton et al., 2014). Furthermore, cognitive impairments continue to deteriorate in 11% of stroke survivors during the first year after stroke (Tham et al., 2002). Therefore, rehabilitation efforts to ameliorate these cognitive impairments are essential.
Guidelines for neurorehabilitation are mainly focused on compensational strategy training (Cicerone et al., 2011).
These strategies do not aim to restore brain functions (i.e.,
restitution), but aim to compensate for the lost function by using
remaining intact functions. In this approach, residual plasticity of the
brain throughout adulthood, which may enable restitution of the
impaired function, is ignored (e.g., Kelly et al., 2006; Takeuchi and Izumi, 2015).
Robertson and Murre (1999)
postulated that depending on the amount of remaining connectivity,
different types of intervention are needed, notably restitution or
compensation. Mildly damaged brain networks might reconnect by everyday
life activities, and no special intervention is necessary. Severely
affected brain networks may not be able to reconnect at all. Therefore,
in severe cases compensational interventions are required that make use
of preserved networks. For moderately affected networks,
restitution-based interventions may be needed to stimulate the relevant
parts of the impaired network.
Restitution focused treatments commonly consist of massed frequent repetition or stimulation of the affected function (Hamzei et al., 2006). They have proven to be effective in the domains of language, motor function, and vision (e.g., Kurland et al., 2010; Thrane et al., 2014).
For other cognitive domains, such as attention and executive function,
restitution training may consist of, for example, training reaction
speed. Conversely, compensation interventions may consist of, for
example, time management training to teach the patient to take more time
for task execution. One type of restitution-based interventions use
computer tasks aimed at training of damaged networks.
To date it is not yet clear whether restitution-based
computer training can improve attention, working memory, and executive
functions. In healthy adults, training effects have been contradictory
(e.g., Owen et al., 2010; Anguera et al., 2013; Corbett et al., 2015), but a recent meta-analysis concluded that cognition can be improved (Toril et al., 2014).
A systematic review of 10 studies in stroke patients concluded that
restitution- and compensation-based interventions improved executive
functions (Poulin et al., 2012).
Even though the review by Poulin et al. did not only focus on
restitution-based computerized training programs, their review does
provide ground to further evaluate these restitution-based training
programs.
This systematic review provides an overview of the
evidence concerning the effects of computer-based restitution
rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain damage to restore
executive functioning. The term executive function includes a spectrum
of cognitive functions, all revolving around control of one's behavior.
This includes mental set shifting (i.e., changing from one set of task
rules to another), information updating, and inhibition of prepotent but
inappropriate responses (Miyake et al., 2000).
For this review we considered working memory and divided (or selective)
attention as part of the executive domain. Training programs that only
focused on vigilance, tonic alertness, and sustained attention without
any divided or selective attention tasks were not included.
More at link
More at link
No comments:
Post a Comment