http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00321/full?
- 1APHP, Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- 2APHP, Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- 3Centre de Recherche de l’Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France
- 4UPMC Paris 6, INSERM, U1127; CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France
- 5CONAM, UPMC Paris 6, INSERM, U1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France
- 6COGIMAGE, UPMC Paris 6, INSERM, U1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France
Introduction
Motor imagery shares a number of similarities with overt movement execution such as behavioral (Jeannerod, 1995), physiological parameters (Kranczioch et al., 2009), and perhaps more importantly, certain functional neuroanatomical correlates (e.g., recruitment of brain motor networks; Confalonieri et al., 2012). Motor imagery has been used in upper limb rehabilitation to improve post-stroke motor function (Page et al., 2011), pain (Moseley, 2006), neglect (Welfringer et al., 2011), or daily living activities (Liu et al., 2004),
mostly at the subacute and the chronic stage. Two randomized controlled
trials have trained patients by mental practice at the acute stage (Liu et al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2010) but one examined specifically motor function in a small sample of patients (n
= 17). Yet, a clear understanding of whether and how mental simulation
performance is modified by motor stroke and when is needed, especially
at the acute stage. Motor imagery is actually an umbrella term that
includes two different types: implicit and explicit mental imagery (Di Rienzo et al., 2014).
Implicit motor imagery concerns the ability to perform mental rotation,
usually with one part of the body, by a first person perspective. It
can be tested by the Hand Laterality Judgment Task (HLJT) in which a
subject has to determine the laterality (handedness) of pictures of
hands (De Vries et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2013).
In this type of task, stroke patients are susceptible to exhibit
decreases in accuracy, RTs, or both. Explicit imagery is the internal
rehearsal of a movement (for example, a fist closure task) that could be
imagined visually or kinesthetically (Malouin et al., 2012; Wong et al., 2013).
In the context of explicit imagery, the number of executed and imagined
movements in a given amount of time (temporal congruence) has also been
suggested to be altered in stroke patients (Di Rienzo et al., 2014).
It is, however, worth noting that studies investigating these
performances have been performed at the chronic phase (>3 months)
except in one study (De Vries et al., 2011).
In other words, motor imagery abilities at the acute stage of stroke
are not well known and may be of importance to use mental practice as a
tool in upper limb rehabilitation, as soon as possible. In addition, the
impact of the side of the lesion on motor imagery has been questioned
in a recent review (Di Rienzo et al., 2014),
and for both types of motor imagery. In order to better characterize
the abilities of stroke patients in implicit and explicit motor imagery,
we performed a behavioral study in acute stroke patients and healthy
individuals. First, we compared the characteristics of implicit and
explicit imagery in healthy subjects and stroke patients. We then
investigated which type of motor imagery was impaired specifically in
right- and left-sided lesions. Finally, we correlated the motor imagery
performance with motor function in patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment