Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Building Cross-Disciplinary Research Collaborations

This is what you as the American Stroke Association should be doing. But you are so fucking lazy and incompetent that you don't even know how bad you are.  I see nothing you are doing that has a strategy to get all survivors 100% recovered. Or even that you know about all the fucking problems in stroke needing to be solved. Why the fuck is Stroke in your name?
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/49/3/e43?platform=hootsuite
Eliza C. Miller, Lisa Leffert
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020437
Originally published February 8, 2018

  • Article

  • Info & Metrics

  • This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

  • stroke
  • As a broad and heterogeneous diagnosis, stroke stands at the intersection of many related specialties. Thus, stroke researchers have a unique opportunity to collaborate across a wide range of clinical and basic science disciplines. In addition to the more obvious collaboration opportunities (eg working with cardiologists on clinical trials with composite cardiovascular outcomes), stroke researchers may work in fields as diverse as primary care, oncology, obstetrics, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, biomedical engineering, environmental science, and health disparities.
    Cross-disciplinary biomedical research synthesizes expertise from diverse contributing disciplines and develops new scientific approaches to address complex problems in health.1 Cross-disciplinary approaches can be as simple as research collaborations involving several medical subspecialties. More complex endeavors, such as collaborations between clinical researchers and scientists from widely different disciplines (eg engineers or social scientists), may be termed transdisciplinary research; however, similar principles apply. For the purposes of this discussion, we refer to the entire spectrum of multidisciplinary collaborative research as cross-disciplinary research.
    Collaborating with investigators outside your own field requires more than just adding a coauthor to a paper or proposal. True collaborations will not always be without conflict. Navigating the challenges of cross-disciplinary research successfully can lead to significant rewards in terms of job satisfaction and career development, and most importantly, to the advancement of scientific understanding.
    Early career vascular neurologists interested in growing robust cross-disciplinary research collaborations might consider the following approaches.

    Think Problem Based, Not Organ System Based

    A good research question identifies a gap in knowledge about a specific problem, which, in turn, may require expertise from multiple scientific disciplines to answer. For example, a stroke neurologist investigating intracranial atherosclerosis might collaborate with a vascular surgeon studying peripheral vascular disease, a radiologist studying vessel wall imaging, or a biomedical engineer measuring arterial compliance. Alternatively, a stroke neurologist might be interested in rare causes of stroke affecting a …
    View Full Text

    American Heart Association Professional?

    Log in with your Professional Heart Daily username and password. Not an American Heart Association Professional? Continue below.

    Log in using your username and password


    Enter your Stroke username.
    Enter the password that accompanies your username.
    your user name or password?
    Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00
    Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment