Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Pilot Study of Assisted Finger Extension Training in a Virtual Environment

You'll have to have your doctor get the protocol and orthosis. Of course this is for chronic so your insurance has stopped paying years ago.

Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Pilot Study of Assisted Finger Extension Training in a Virtual Environment

2007, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
 Heidi C. Fischer, Kathy Stubblefield, Tiffany Kline, Xun Luo, Robert V. Kenyon, and Derek G. Kamper
Top Stroke Rehabil
 2007;14(1):1–12© 2007 Thomas Land Publishers, Inc.www.thomasland.comdoi: 10.1310/tsr1401-1
1
Heidi C. Fischer, MS, OTR/L, is Clinical ResearchCoordinator, Sensory Motor Performance Program,Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Kathy Stubblefield, OTR/L, is Research OccupationalTherapist, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tiffany Kline, MS, is Software Engineer, Northstar Neuroscience, Seattle, Washington.
 Xun Luo, MS, is Doctoral Student, Computer ScienceDepartment, University of Illinois at Chicago.
 Robert V. Kenyon, PhD, is Associate Professor, Computer Science Department, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Derek G. Kamper, PhD, is Research Scientist, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, and Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering,Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.

Background and Purpose:
 The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the impact of assisted motor training in a virtual environment on hand function in stroke survivors.
Participants:
 Fifteen volunteer stroke survivors (32–88 years old)with chronic upper extremity hemiparesis (1–38 years post incident) took part.
Method:
 Participants had 6 weeks of training in reach-to-grasp of virtual and actual objects. They were randomized to one of three groups: assistance of digit extension provided by a novel cable orthosis, assistance provided by a novel pneumatic orthosis, or no assistance provided.Hand performance was evaluated at baseline, immediately following training, and 1 month after completion of training.Clinical assessments included the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Box and Blocks Test (BB), Upper Extremity Fugl-MeyerTest (FM), and Rancho Los Amigos Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity (RLA). Biomechanical assessments included grip strength, extension range of motion and velocity, spasticity, and isometric strength.
Results:
 Participants demonstrated a significant decrease in time to perform functional tasks for the WMFT (
p = .02), an increase in the number of blocks successfully grasped and released during the BB (
p = .09), and an increase for the FM score (p = .08). There were no statistically significant changes in time to complete tasks on the RLA or any of the biomechanical measures. Assistance of extension did not have a significant effect.
Discussion and Conclusion:
 After the training period, participants in all 3 groups demonstrated a decrease in time to perform some of the functional tasks. Although the overall gains were slight, the general acceptance of the novel rehabilitation tools by a population with substantial impairment suggests that a larger randomized controlled trial, potentially in a subacute population, may be warranted. 

No comments:

Post a Comment