This is too easy to solve. The people that need motivation are stroke doctors, researchers, and hospitals to actually get off their asses and solve stroke. 100% recovery.
Survivors wouldn't need motivation if you had 100% recovery protocols. They would be too busy doing the reps needed to recover. Knowing EXACTLY what needs to be done to recover would be motivation enough. Get away from useless guidelines and this motivation problem goes away.
Motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation: A Delphi study
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Volume 101(11) , Pgs. 1929-1936.
NARIC Accession Number: J85305. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Oyake, Kazuaki ; Suzuki, Makoto ; Otaka, Yohei ; Momose, Kimito ; Tanaka, Satoshi.
Publication Year: 2020.
Number of Pages: 8.
Abstract: The primary objective was to provide a list of effective motivational strategies based on consensus among rehabilitation experts, generated using the Delphi technique. The secondary objective was to identify the types of information that are important when selecting motivational strategies. Participants were 198 rehabilitation experts including physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists who had worked in stroke rehabilitation for at least 5 years. Panelists were asked to rate the effectiveness of motivational strategies and to rate the importance of different types of information using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as having been reached for items with an interquartile range of 1 or less. A total of 116 experts (58.6 percent) completed the third round of the Delphi survey. Consensus was reached on all 26 presented strategies. Seven strategies, such as control of task difficulty and goal setting(Damn it all you are demanding that stroke survivors accept your fucking tyranny of low expectations.), were considered very effective in increasing patient motivation. In addition, all 11 of the presented types of information regarding patient health status, environmental factors, and personal factors were deemed very important or important in determining which motivational strategies to use. A list of effective motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation was generated based on expert consensus. The results suggest that experts consider a comprehensive range of patient information when choosing motivational strategies. These findings represent a group of consensus-based recommendations for increasing patient adherence to stroke rehabilitation programs, which may be beneficial to many medical professionals working in stroke rehabilitation.
Descriptor Terms: MOTIVATION, QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS, REHABILITATION, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Oyake, Kazuaki , Suzuki, Makoto , Otaka, Yohei , Momose, Kimito , Tanaka, Satoshi. (2020). Motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation: A Delphi study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 101(11), Pgs. 1929-1936. Retrieved 1/20/2021, from REHABDATA database.
* The majority of journal articles, books, and reports in our collection are only available by regular mail, rather than downloadable electronic format. Learn more about our digital collection and our document delivery service.
More information about this publication:
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
NARIC Accession Number: J85305. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Oyake, Kazuaki ; Suzuki, Makoto ; Otaka, Yohei ; Momose, Kimito ; Tanaka, Satoshi.
Publication Year: 2020.
Number of Pages: 8.
Abstract: The primary objective was to provide a list of effective motivational strategies based on consensus among rehabilitation experts, generated using the Delphi technique. The secondary objective was to identify the types of information that are important when selecting motivational strategies. Participants were 198 rehabilitation experts including physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists who had worked in stroke rehabilitation for at least 5 years. Panelists were asked to rate the effectiveness of motivational strategies and to rate the importance of different types of information using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as having been reached for items with an interquartile range of 1 or less. A total of 116 experts (58.6 percent) completed the third round of the Delphi survey. Consensus was reached on all 26 presented strategies. Seven strategies, such as control of task difficulty and goal setting(Damn it all you are demanding that stroke survivors accept your fucking tyranny of low expectations.), were considered very effective in increasing patient motivation. In addition, all 11 of the presented types of information regarding patient health status, environmental factors, and personal factors were deemed very important or important in determining which motivational strategies to use. A list of effective motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation was generated based on expert consensus. The results suggest that experts consider a comprehensive range of patient information when choosing motivational strategies. These findings represent a group of consensus-based recommendations for increasing patient adherence to stroke rehabilitation programs, which may be beneficial to many medical professionals working in stroke rehabilitation.
Descriptor Terms: MOTIVATION, QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS, REHABILITATION, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Oyake, Kazuaki , Suzuki, Makoto , Otaka, Yohei , Momose, Kimito , Tanaka, Satoshi. (2020). Motivational strategies for stroke rehabilitation: A Delphi study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 101(11), Pgs. 1929-1936. Retrieved 1/20/2021, from REHABDATA database.
* The majority of journal articles, books, and reports in our collection are only available by regular mail, rather than downloadable electronic format. Learn more about our digital collection and our document delivery service.
More information about this publication:
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
No comments:
Post a Comment