http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913009762
- Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles
Abstract
Numerous
studies have demonstrated a sexual dimorphism of the human corpus
callosum. However, the question remains if sex differences in brain
size, which typically is larger in men than in women, or biological sex per se
account for the apparent sex differences in callosal morphology.
Comparing callosal dimensions between men and women matched for overall
brain size may clarify the true contribution of biological sex, as any
observed group difference should indicate pure sex effects. We thus
examined callosal morphology in 24 male and 24 female brains carefully
matched for overall size. In addition, we selected 24 extremely large
male brains and 24 extremely small female brains to explore if observed
sex effects might vary depending on the degree to which male and female
groups differed in brain size. Using the individual T1-weighted brain
images (n = 96), we delineated the corpus callosum at midline and
applied a well-validated surface-based mesh-modeling approach to compare
callosal thickness at 100 equidistant points between groups determined
by brain size and sex. The corpus callosum was always thicker in men
than in women. However, this callosal sex difference was strongly
determined by the cerebral sex difference overall. That is, the larger
the discrepancy in brain size between men and women, the more pronounced
the sex difference in callosal thickness, with hardly any callosal
differences remaining between brain-size matched men and women.
Altogether, these findings suggest that individual differences in brain
size account for apparent sex differences in the anatomy of the corpus
callosum.
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution
Check access
No comments:
Post a Comment