So VRT is more effective but you didn't write up a protocol on it, so completely useless. Didn't your mentors and senior researchers tell you the only goal of stroke research is rehab protocols leading to 100% recovery? They were that incompetent? Did you account for this possibly being the Hawthorne effect?
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy versus Dual Task Training on Balance and Gait in Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) Stroke
Abstract:
- Introduction: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy (VRT) and Dual Task (DT) training are rehabilitation approaches increasingly used in the care of stroke patients to improve balance and gait, although no comparative evidence has been provided for their efficacy. Aim: The study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation therapy versus dual task training on balance and gait in posterior cerebral artery stroke. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 subjects i.e., subacute Posterior Cerebral Arterystroke individuals were randomly assigned into 2 groups, group A Vestibular Rehabilitation with Conventional Therapy (n=15) and group B DT training (n=15). Each group received treatment for 45 minutes in a day, 3 times in a week for 4 weeks. Both the groups A and B were also given Conventional Physiotherapy treatment comprising of stretching, strengthening and stability exercises, over the period for 5 days for 4 weeks. Participants were assisted with Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) to assess the performance of gait and Mini-BEST test to assess the balance. Mean change score were calculated as the difference between post and pre-test scores and an independent t-test was used to test the difference in the changed scores between two groups. Paired t-test was used to analyse within group differences. A level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: The comparison of post intervention scores of Mini- BESTest between Group A and Group B showed significant difference (t-value=2.577, p-value=0.018). The comparison of post intervention scores of WGS between Group A and Group B showed significant difference (t-value= -2.356, p-value=0.028). So, result showed that Group A (Vestibular Rehabilitation) was more significant as compared to Group B (DT training) in both Mini-BESTest and WGS.
- Conclusion: The result of this study is encouraging to use VRT as a part of rehabilitation protocol by alleviating their gait disturbances, improving balance and gaining confidence of walking with PCA stroke patients as compared with DT Training.
- Copyright of Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research is the property of JCDR Research & Publications Private Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
For access to this entire article and additional high
quality information, please check with your college/university library,
local public library, or affiliated institution.
No comments:
Post a Comment