I'm assuming that Elo in not this definition: The Elo rating system is a method for calculating the relative skill levels of players in zero-sum games such as chess.
So no clue what this is.
Maybe this will help you:
Applications of the Elo rating system in adaptive educational systems
But if not understandable to laypersons how do you expect stroke survivors to train their medical staff in its use?
Toward Personalized Web-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Elo Rating Approach
Toward Personalized Web-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Elo Rating Approach
Abstract
Background:
Stroke
is a worldwide cause of disability; 40% of stroke survivors sustain
cognitive impairments, most of them following inpatient rehabilitation
at specialized clinical centers. Web-based cognitive rehabilitation
tasks are extensively used in clinical settings. The impact of task
execution depends on the ratio between the skills of the treated patient
and the challenges imposed by the task itself. Thus, treatment
personalization requires a trade-off between patients’ skills and task
difficulties, which is still an open issue. In this study, we propose
Elo ratings to support clinicians in tasks assignations and representing
patients’ skills to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.
Objective:
This
study aims to stratify patients with ischemic stroke at an early stage
of rehabilitation into three levels according to their Elo rating; to
show the relationships between the Elo rating levels, task difficulty
levels, and rehabilitation outcomes; and to determine if the Elo rating
obtained at early stages of rehabilitation is a significant predictor of
rehabilitation outcomes.
Methods:
The
PlayerRatings R library was used to obtain the Elo rating for each
patient. Working memory was assessed using the DIGITS subtest of the
Barcelona test, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Memory Test (RAVLT) was used
to assess verbal memory. Three subtests of RAVLT were used: RAVLT
learning (RAVLT075), free-recall memory (RAVLT015), and recognition
(RAVLT015R). Memory predictors were identified using forward stepwise
selection to add covariates to the models, which were evaluated by
assessing discrimination using the area under the receiver operating
characteristic curve (AUC) for logistic regressions and adjusted R2 for linear regressions.
Results:
Three
Elo levels (low, middle, and high) with the same number of patients
(n=96) in each Elo group were obtained using the 50 initial task
executions (from a total of 38,177) for N=288 adult patients
consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation in a clinical
setting. The mid-Elo level showed the highest proportions of patients
that improved in all four memory items: 56% (54/96) of them improved in
DIGITS, 67% (64/96) in RAVLT075, 58% (56/96) in RAVLT015, and 53%
(51/96) in RAVLT015R (P<.001). The proportions of patients
from the mid-Elo level that performed tasks at difficulty levels 1, 2,
and 3 were 32.1% (3997/12,449), 31.% (3997/12,449), and 36.9%
(4595/12,449), respectively (P<.001), showing the highest
match between skills (represented by Elo level) and task difficulties,
considering the set of 38,177 task executions. Elo ratings were
significant predictors in three of the four models and quasi-significant
in the fourth. When predicting RAVLT075 and DIGITS at discharge, we
obtained R2=0.54 and 0.43, respectively; meanwhile, we
obtained AUC=0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.82) and AUC=0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.89) in
RAVLT075 and DIGITS improvement predictions, respectively.
Conclusions:
Elo
ratings can support clinicians in early rehabilitation stages in
identifying cognitive profiles to be used for assigning task difficulty
levels.
doi:10.2196/28090
No comments:
Post a Comment