Assessment in the title immediately tells me this does nothing to get survivors recovered! I'd fire anyone doing 'assessment' research!
THE ADULT ASSISTING HAND ASSESSMENT STROKE: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF AN INNOVATIVE OBSERVATION-BASED ASSESSMENT IN STROKE REHABILITATION
THE ADULT ASSISTING HAND ASSESSMENT STROKE: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF AN
INNOVATIVE OBSERVATION-BASED ASSESSMENT IN STROKE REHABILITATION
Annick Van Gils1, Sarah Meyer1, Lena Krumlinde-Sundhlom2, Daphne Kos1and Geert
Verheyden1
1 KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, 3001 Leuven,
Belgium. Annick.vangils@kuleuven.be
2 Neuropediatric Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Objectives:
INNOVATIVE OBSERVATION-BASED ASSESSMENT IN STROKE REHABILITATION
Annick Van Gils1, Sarah Meyer1, Lena Krumlinde-Sundhlom2, Daphne Kos1and Geert
Verheyden1
1 KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tervuursevest 101, bus 1501, 3001 Leuven,
Belgium. Annick.vangils@kuleuven.be
2 Neuropediatric Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Objectives:
The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment (Ad-AHA) Stroke is an observation-based instrument assessing the effectiveness of the spontaneous use of the affected hand when performing bimanual activities in adults after stroke. Internal scale and concurrent validity have been demonstrated(Krumlinde-Sundholm, 2013). This study investigates concurrent and discriminant validity and interrater and intrarater reliability of Ad-AHA Stroke.
Methods:
Stroke survivors are recruited within the first six months post stroke. Concurrent validity is appraised by calculating correlations between Ad-AHA Stroke and ABILHAND Questionnaire, Action Arm Research Test (ARAT) and Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FM). Differences in Ad-AHA Stroke scores for distinctive levels of motor impairment evaluated discriminant validity. Reliability is examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Data of 118 stroke survivors is analyzed (mean age 66±12.3 years; mean time post stroke 92±52 days; mean UE-FM 35 points (±24 points). Correlations between Ad-AHA Stroke and clinical assessments is high (r=0.8 0.9), supporting concurrent validity. Significant differences in Ad-AHA Stroke scores are found for different levels of motor impairment, suggesting discriminant validity. ICC for interrater agreement is 0.99 (95% CI=0.98-0.99) and for intrarater 0.99 (95% CI=0.99-0.99). SEM is 2.36 for interrater and 2.15 for intrarater reliability, MDC is 6 for both interrater and intrarater reliability.
Conclusions:
The Ad-AHA Stroke is a novel test offering an innovative and relevant approach on upper limb assessment post stroke. Results of Ad-AHA Stroke may guide occupational therapy goals and interventions that target effective bimanual task performance. Psychometric properties for the Ad-AHA Stroke are further underpinned by the results of this study, and support use of the Ad- AHA Stroke in clinical practice and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment